Yeah, I know one guy can do some traceroutes and he thinks he then understands how the traffic works on the other end, but this reads like a lot of low-evidence theorizing.
The consumer's approach is solid with what tools he has. Discover a slow down, trace it, then ask the provider. Not sure what better report he could have made. And the provider told him flat out "yes", after they were caught though, could have been ignorance.
The providers are admitting they are doing so and patenting algorithms (https://torrentfreak.com/att-develops-credits-system-to-limit-file-sharing-bandwidth-140129/) for throttling and such, clearly its going that direction.
here is no way a random customer service rep knows this.
Why wouldn't customer service reps know when certain [popular] sites are having their data throttled on their networks, if enough customers are asking about it?
There is no way a random customer service rep knows this. You know this, right? He doesn't have access to the backend data either.
It's legal, why wouldn't they admit it?
The providers can do it, there's just nothing to indicate that they are at this time.
You yourself said you personally have problems accessing Netflix and nothing but Netflix for some long period of time. But I guess your own experiences aren't evidence of anything.
You yourself said you personally have problems accessing Netflix and nothing but Netflix for some long period of time. But I guess your own experiences aren't evidence of anything.
That's correct, anecdote is not data. And no, not "nothing but Netflix." FIOS has had issues with Spotify and YouTube as well, but it's not an issue of neutrality, but one of network consistency.
But the mass plural of anecdote is data. Which you either refuse to look at, or, if you have, refuse to acknowledge.
FIOS has had issues with Spotify and YouTube as well...
Well then, that proves your case! Wait, no it doesn't. If it were proven that Verizon limits speeds to high-bandwidth services like Netflix, why wouldn't Verizon also limit other high-bandwidth services?
But the mass plural of anecdote is data. Which you either refuse to look at, or, if you have, refuse to acknowledge.
True. There isn't really anything in the way of data to see, though.
Well then, that proves your case! Wait, no it doesn't. If it were proven that Verizon limits speeds to high-bandwidth services like Netflix, why wouldn't Verizon also limit other high-bandwidth services?
The most likely scenario is that it's not Verizon limiting anything, but that certain carriers simply have a harder time communicating with the Verizon network for any number of reasons.
There is no way a random customer service rep knows this. You know this, right? He doesn't have access to the backend data either.
Provider customer support must field calls like this all day. I bet they have more insight than do consumers. Or I would if I worked there! ;-)
You don't need complete transparency to determine where a delay occurs though, IP is cool like that.
But to know why its happening would take some insight, I agree.
there's just nothing to indicate that they are at this time.
Throttling is standard operating procedure for good or ill. Companies see the throttling techniques themselves as intellectual property (http://www.google.com/patents/US20140010082). The questions are more why and how. Again, companies are patenting technologies to more intelligently and effectively throttle based on a variety of situations. I'm thinking its part of the business model of all providers.
[/whoops, just refreshed, now I have much to read]
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 05:21 pm (UTC)The providers are admitting they are doing so and patenting algorithms (https://torrentfreak.com/att-develops-credits-system-to-limit-file-sharing-bandwidth-140129/) for throttling and such, clearly its going that direction.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 05:23 pm (UTC)And the provider told him flat out "yes", after they were caught though, could have been ignorance.
There is no way a random customer service rep knows this. You know this, right? He doesn't have access to the backend data either.
The providers are admitting they are doing so and patenting algorithms for throttling and such, clearly its going that direction.
The providers can do it, there's just nothing to indicate that they are at this time.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 05:39 pm (UTC)Why wouldn't customer service reps know when certain [popular] sites are having their data throttled on their networks, if enough customers are asking about it?
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:23 pm (UTC)What evidence do you have for this claim?
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:22 pm (UTC)It's legal, why wouldn't they admit it?
The providers can do it, there's just nothing to indicate that they are at this time.
You yourself said you personally have problems accessing Netflix and nothing but Netflix for some long period of time. But I guess your own experiences aren't evidence of anything.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:29 pm (UTC)The consumers are idiots, mostly.
You yourself said you personally have problems accessing Netflix and nothing but Netflix for some long period of time. But I guess your own experiences aren't evidence of anything.
That's correct, anecdote is not data. And no, not "nothing but Netflix." FIOS has had issues with Spotify and YouTube as well, but it's not an issue of neutrality, but one of network consistency.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:40 pm (UTC)That makes it untrue?
That's correct, anecdote is not data.
But the mass plural of anecdote is data. Which you either refuse to look at, or, if you have, refuse to acknowledge.
FIOS has had issues with Spotify and YouTube as well...
Well then, that proves your case! Wait, no it doesn't. If it were proven that Verizon limits speeds to high-bandwidth services like Netflix, why wouldn't Verizon also limit other high-bandwidth services?
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:42 pm (UTC)in part for this sort of response, yes.
But the mass plural of anecdote is data. Which you either refuse to look at, or, if you have, refuse to acknowledge.
True. There isn't really anything in the way of data to see, though.
Well then, that proves your case! Wait, no it doesn't. If it were proven that Verizon limits speeds to high-bandwidth services like Netflix, why wouldn't Verizon also limit other high-bandwidth services?
The most likely scenario is that it's not Verizon limiting anything, but that certain carriers simply have a harder time communicating with the Verizon network for any number of reasons.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 07:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 09:29 pm (UTC)Provider customer support must field calls like this all day. I bet they have more insight than do consumers. Or I would if I worked there! ;-)
You don't need complete transparency to determine where a delay occurs though, IP is cool like that.
But to know why its happening would take some insight, I agree.
there's just nothing to indicate that they are at this time.
Throttling is standard operating procedure for good or ill. Companies see the throttling techniques themselves as intellectual property (http://www.google.com/patents/US20140010082). The questions are more why and how. Again, companies are patenting technologies to more intelligently and effectively throttle based on a variety of situations. I'm thinking its part of the business model of all providers.
[/whoops, just refreshed, now I have much to read]
no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-24 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-23 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-24 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-24 10:56 pm (UTC)