I know enough about this matter, to bother with the nonsenses of liberal media, funded by Soros. But, when I have more time, I can read those and discuss with you, if you want.
The first link: So you were expecting Anheuser-Busch to announce that they bribed Clinton. Do you know who is Nazarbaev?
Not all of those sources are so-called "liberal media" but suit yourself.
The other side of this coin is that I can't see any reason why I should look at a heavily biased book about the Clintons that has already been thoroughly debunked.
This particular avenue of discussion seems to have reached a dead end. Not going to lose any sleep over it, personally.
Not all of those sources are so-called "liberal media" but suit yourself.
You don't understand - anything source that deviates from the Faux News orthodoxy is "liberal media" and therefore not to be trusted. How else are you going to keep the cultists inside the bubble?
The other side of this coin is that I can't see any reason why I should look at a heavily biased book about the Clintons that has already been thoroughly debunked.
You don't understand - anything source that deviates from the MSNBS orthodoxy is "right wing media" and therefore not to be trusted. How else are you going to keep the cultists inside the bubble?
You don't understand - anything source that deviates from the MSNBS orthodoxy is "right wing media" and therefore not to be trusted. How else are you going to keep the cultists inside the bubble?
A spokeswoman for the company said, "This is a routine notification that Amazon sends to previous version purchasers whenever there is an updated file. The changes that amazon is referring to as significant are actually quite minor. We made 7-8 factual corrections after the first printing and fixed a technical issue regarding the endnotes. This global fix may have made the changes appear more extensive than they were."
My reading comprehension is just fine. Your quote above is just the publisher trying to cover their ass. There is nothing "routine" or "minor" about this:
According to Politico, the updated version removes a passage outlining how Bill Clinton gave paid speeches to TD Bank, a shareholder in the Keystone XL pipeline, and the bank said it would begin selling its shares in Keystone after Hillary Clinton left the State Department. But author Peter Schweizer reportedly cited a fake press release as his source for TD Bank's plans to sell its Keystone shares.
Politifact.com is an "independent, nonpartisan news organization ... not beholden to any government, political party or corporate interest." http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/blog/2011/oct/06/who-pays-for-politifact/
Tell you the truth, I don't care much, I am pretty good in sifting through. The only problem is that some people take everything they read as a proven truth, no arguments accepted.
Tell you the truth, I don't care much, I am pretty good in sifting through. The only problem is that some people take everything they read as a proven truth, no arguments accepted.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2015-11-09 06:19 pm (UTC)http://correctrecord.org/clinton-cash-debunked/
http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/04/30/twenty-plus-errors-fabrications-and-distortions/203480
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/apr/26/peter-schweizer/fact-checking-clinton-cash-author-claim-about-bill/
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/04/25/republican-clinton-cash-scandal-collapses-book-released.html
no subject
Date: 2015-11-10 01:47 am (UTC)The first link:
So you were expecting Anheuser-Busch to announce that they bribed Clinton.
Do you know who is Nazarbaev?
no subject
Date: 2015-11-10 03:15 pm (UTC)The other side of this coin is that I can't see any reason why I should look at a heavily biased book about the Clintons that has already been thoroughly debunked.
This particular avenue of discussion seems to have reached a dead end. Not going to lose any sleep over it, personally.
no subject
Date: 2015-11-10 03:46 pm (UTC)You don't understand - anything source that deviates from the Faux News orthodoxy is "liberal media" and therefore not to be trusted. How else are you going to keep the cultists inside the bubble?
The other side of this coin is that I can't see any reason why I should look at a heavily biased book about the Clintons that has already been thoroughly debunked.
Not to mention one where the publisher had to make "significant revisions" two weeks after publication to correct factual errors in reporting:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/clinton-cash-publisher-corrects-errors-in-book/
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/15/politics/clinton-cash-book-revisions/
The house of cards fell almost as soon as it was propped up.
no subject
Date: 2015-11-10 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-10 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-11 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-18 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-11 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-11 01:38 am (UTC)A spokeswoman for the company said, "This is a routine notification that Amazon sends to previous version purchasers whenever there is an updated file. The changes that amazon is referring to as significant are actually quite minor. We made 7-8 factual corrections after the first printing and fixed a technical issue regarding the endnotes. This global fix may have made the changes appear more extensive than they were."
no subject
Date: 2015-11-18 06:11 pm (UTC)According to Politico, the updated version removes a passage outlining how Bill Clinton gave paid speeches to TD Bank, a shareholder in the Keystone XL pipeline, and the bank said it would begin selling its shares in Keystone after Hillary Clinton left the State Department. But author Peter Schweizer reportedly cited a fake press release as his source for TD Bank's plans to sell its Keystone shares.
Dan Rather was fired for less.
no subject
Date: 2015-11-11 01:19 am (UTC)It is your right to support any corrupt politician you like, but I thought you wanted to know.
no subject
Date: 2015-11-11 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-11-12 02:05 am (UTC)http://www.newsmax.com/Reagan/PolitiFact-Fact-Checkers-Bias/2015/03/20/id/631565/
Tell you the truth, I don't care much, I am pretty good in sifting through. The only problem is that some people take everything they read as a proven truth, no arguments accepted.
no subject
Date: 2015-11-12 02:05 am (UTC)http://www.newsmax.com/Reagan/PolitiFact-Fact-Checkers-Bias/2015/03/20/id/631565/
Tell you the truth, I don't care much, I am pretty good in sifting through. The only problem is that some people take everything they read as a proven truth, no arguments accepted.
no subject
Date: 2015-11-18 06:14 pm (UTC)ROTFLMAO!!! Dunning–Kruger much?
no subject
Date: 2015-11-11 01:19 am (UTC)It is your right to support any corrupt politician you like, but I thought you wanted to know.