[identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] politicartoons


She's of course able to say this because of feminism.
(More women missing the point at Beerrrz Feeerrrd)

Date: 2014-07-12 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
Reverse sexism!

Date: 2014-07-12 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com
Just keep voting Republican and see the day when not only can you not get contraceptives covered on your employment health insurance, but you won't be able to legally get it all, and there might be some rethinking.

Date: 2014-07-12 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
States like Mississippi and South Dakota only have one abortion clinic and those states are all about TRAP laws.

People don't understand that feminism or lgbt movements aren't about "special" rights, just equal treatment under the law.

Date: 2014-07-12 07:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com
Well put. The young take for granted the civil rights won last century.
Freedom and equality don't just come naturally.

Date: 2014-07-12 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) (http://reproductiverights.org/en/project/targeted-regulation-of-abortion-providers-trap)

Basically, SCOTUS ruled that states can cockblock abortion services almost to the point of outright banning them. So that's where you have week long waiting periods and mandatory ultrasounds and propaganda lectures, all designed to make a legal service as expensive and difficult to access as possible.

Date: 2014-07-12 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mudryikot.livejournal.com
Ah, that idiocy. We also unfortunately had a mandatory waiting period legislated in.
Are private reproductive health clinics not profitable in US?

Date: 2014-07-12 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
That question seems a bit odd.

Govt regulation applies to private health clinics.

Or at least that is my understanding.

Date: 2014-07-12 08:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mudryikot.livejournal.com
Because whenever there is money to be made businesses can be expected to lobby for relaxation of any regulations. Plus any business looking for someone's money could be willing to apply regulations only as far as they can be controlled.
Government-run establishments on the other hand do not face business reality so they don't give a damn about their clients.
For example here in Russia a women can get a theoretically free abortion in a government clinic. But they will probably apply all the restrictions to the max and pester her as much as possible with pro-life "counseling", because the state ideology calls for population increase plus the government-run medical practices are underfunded and doctors are underpaid. If you go to a private cash-up-front clinic you would get a medical service at least as good (and maybe much better - depending on the price of course). Plus many clinics would probably "overlook" many of the stupider formalities like waiting period. I have hear hearsay that even being a week or two too late by the book can be overlooked, because after all there is no ironclad way to determine gestation period with higher accuracy than one or two weeks.

Date: 2014-07-12 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
As businesses go, they aren't that profitable. Nor do they have the lobby power to take on the right wing religious extremists. Who run for state office positions in most states with impunity.

So it's not like coal mining or an industry that brings in millions in tax revenue. Women's reproductive health is priced low for access.

Date: 2014-07-12 08:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
So two three things.

1) I'm sure in the US if you have the money you can find doctors that might "overlook" certain legal roadblocks--but most people aren't wealthy and a financial roadblock is as bad as any other one. We are already paying outrageously high prices for our health "insurance" (I use scare-quotes because it doesn't always "insure" that you don't go broke taking care of your health) and so adding the legal roadblock--which, of course, can be overcome by throwing money at it--still increases the difficulty of obtaining an abortion

2) It is a religious argument here in the US--not about increasing the population [I've only heard that argument about homosexuality here in the US, never about abortion] and so the religious zealots might, in fact, be quite active in seeking out those who violate their divinely-inspired law.

3) Doctors here are sometimes paid by the number of procedures they do. Thus, if you are a doctor and you could perform 1 procedure (abortion)--OR--you have to do, let's say, 3 procedures (ultrasound, something else, abortion) you get paid for 3 procedures, so more money for you.

So it's a matter of it being partially money-driven, as you might expect (increase procedures=increased payments) and partially being religiously based, which changes the zeal with which enforcement may occur.

*edit: two things became three, I'm looking at you opening statement.
Edited Date: 2014-07-12 08:46 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-07-15 10:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mudryikot.livejournal.com
How "wealthy" are we talking about?
I have just looked up abortion prices in Moscow (which is one the most expensive cities in the world) and it is about 250-700 USD depending on the clinic, lenghth of gestation etc. This is not particularly expensive IMO.

Date: 2014-07-15 01:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
When you are living paycheck to paycheck, as so many Americans do, $700 is not cheap.
For example, I don't even have $300 in my savings acct right now. When you're broke, anything more than the meager amount you have is a lot.

Lots of Americans are perpetually broke.

Date: 2014-07-16 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mudryikot.livejournal.com
Well, yes, it's not really cheap. But compared to the costs and length of raising an unwanted child... even loansharks or organ buyers seem a nicer alternative.

Date: 2014-07-15 06:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com
Most health clinics are private here. There is no abortion clinic that is funded by tax payer money. Some county health centers provide condoms or the pill, but anything else has to come from a private doctor. (Planned parenthood is technically a private provider)

Date: 2014-07-15 10:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mudryikot.livejournal.com
And if these clinics are private and do make profits - how do the state governments manage to decrease their numbers? Do they fiddle licenses or some zoning laws?

Date: 2014-07-15 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com
That would be exactly it.

Trap laws require clinics to be within X distance of a hospital, or have a physician with admitting privileges at a hospital within X miles (note, my orthopedic surgeon didn't have that and I could just as easily have died due to an error of his as a botched abortion. If you have to go to an ER for a medical problem, the ER doc will admit you). One of the new tricks is requiring their clinic buildings to be built to a different code then other medical providers. One such: requiring janitorial closets in every procedure room. Again, a law that -only- applied to abortion clinics.

None of these laws actually have anything to do with the woman's health, just with restricting access.

Date: 2014-07-16 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mudryikot.livejournal.com
So, have the clinics tried to sue for discriminatory practices?

Date: 2014-07-16 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com
There are actually lawsuits pending in many states over these. In some cases, like Kansas, they got implementation delayed til the lawsuit was over, in some like Texas they did not and clinics have closed. There are now very few womens health clinics left in Texas that can give abortions, one of which is owned by the governor of Texas's family members.

Date: 2014-07-17 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mudryikot.livejournal.com
So, have the clinics tried to sue for discriminatory practices?

Date: 2014-07-12 07:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
What a fat, bitchy, probably Mexican, slut.

(disclaimer: not my actual POV)

Date: 2014-07-12 07:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Herman Cain will tell you how awesome and not-racist the GOP is too.

Date: 2014-07-12 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
I think I'll just wait for Thanksgiving for that, thanks.

Date: 2014-07-12 11:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farchivist.livejournal.com
What a fat, bitchy, probably Mexican, slut.
(disclaimer: not my actual POV)


And you're rebroadcasting these extremely negative sexist terms, why?
For instance, what does her possibly being Mexican have a thing to do with it? Are you saying this is typical of POC? Or of Hispanics from Mexico in general? Is this a condition of "the browns" or something?
How do you know she is a slut? And why would that be a bad thing to begin with?
Fat? You mean you like 'em anorexic? Or hipster thin? Because she sure as shit don't look fat to me.
And bitchy? You know this person so well you can speak with authoritativly about it? Or is it that you assumed this because you don't like what she has to say?

Date: 2014-07-13 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
Wow, someone does not understand mocking the other side, huh?

It's almost like you entirely failed to understand my disclaimer.

I said it because that's what the idiots opposed to feminism would say.

Date: 2014-07-16 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farchivist.livejournal.com
It's almost like you entirely failed to understand my disclaimer.

No, more like I don't believe your disclaimer. The disclaimer is counter to your opinions that you have voiced in the past.

I said it because that's what the idiots opposed to feminism would say.

I believe you said it because it's what you believe.

Date: 2014-07-17 05:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
"I believe you said it because it's what you believe. "

Well, you're wrong.

I cannot help that you do not believe my disclaimer. What opinions that I have voiced in the past do you mean? Methinks you doth make crap up.

Date: 2014-07-20 10:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farchivist.livejournal.com
What opinions that I have voiced in the past do you mean? Methinks you doth make crap up.

Pretty much every comment you make on posts about feminism, cat-calling, and so on. You're right up there with Madscience or David Deacon levels of misogyny.

Date: 2014-07-12 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wight1984.livejournal.com
So a mixture of slut-shaming and ignorance of what feminism commonly entails.

That being said, it does show why judging a person's position on gender politics by their gender is dubious; lived experience of a problem is useful but it doesn't guarantee a correct opinion on the topic. There are male people who lack that lived experience who have a better grasp of gender politics than these specific women.

Date: 2014-07-12 08:49 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-07-12 08:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
Same goes for race. Know a female of mixed background, she says she never had a problem with police. She's a few shades lighter than Obama, but nobody would look at her and say she is white. A much darker black man I know finds it (sadly) laughable how she denies the sorts of racism coming from the police that he has experienced. It also hurts him that he is over six feet tall. She is about avg height for a woman with big boobs. She doesn't understand why she hasn't felt the experience of police racism--and because she hasn't experienced it, she has a problem seeing it, even intellectually.

Date: 2014-07-13 12:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com
My favorite one is the woman in the military asking what feminism ever did for her.

Date: 2014-07-15 06:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com
Well yes, before feminism a woman in the Military got a cushy desk job making coffee for a man, or a job as a nurse. Isn't that what we all secretly want? To work with no real risks?

Yeah, idiots abound, sadly.

Date: 2014-07-13 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadaria.livejournal.com
Can I make one?
It will say "I don't know what feminism is but I have this poster board and a twitter account"

Date: 2014-07-14 06:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonshaz.livejournal.com
That's it in a fucking NUTSHELL!!

*is mightily pissed off by these stupid little snips who don't know what the fuck they're talking/scribbling about*

Date: 2014-07-15 06:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com
Some days I wonder if the girls write that crap, or if they post a blank picture on the net with the sign, and let other people photoshop in the words. I just can't see how you can be that dumb, and still read.

Date: 2014-07-14 06:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonshaz.livejournal.com
Image

Image

Image
Edited Date: 2014-07-14 06:17 am (UTC)

Date: 2014-07-15 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bibliophile-26.livejournal.com
The women who are posting these photos obviously have no idea what feminism is all about, and that's truly depressing. They need to be smacked in the head with a large dose of intelligence.

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 11:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios