What's unscientific about it is... Malasadas is a coward and doesn't have the balls to come out and admit he supports Obamacare.
He isn't honest enough and doesn't have the confidence in his own views to explicitly and concisely detail his stance on the topic and plays these childish games where he posts internet memes he thinks are funny to overcompensate for his lack of a personality.
Avoiding factual statements & refusing to explicitly define your stance on a topic as Malasadas does is unscientific.
Malasadas disagrees with criticism on the affordable care act because he strongly supports the aca.
Yet he is afraid of a burden of proof and refuses to state exactly what his views are on the topic and habitually posts unrelated and offtopic memes.
Those who appreciate and love science do not avoid a burden of proof. They have the courage to explicitly state what their views are on a topic like healthcare reform.
Malasadas avoiding the topic is unscientific and barrs the possibility of real or meaningful discussion on the topic.
I am willing to admit that all of you who support the ACA and refuse to examine your reasons for doing so, are as unscientific as creationists who believe the earth is 10,000 years old, who also refuse to examine their reasons for believing such.
Are we beginning to approach some relative degree of unscience, nao?
Why are you creating some a personal grudge match? This guy you have been recently slinging a shit load of taunts and insults at has some fairly significant credibility. You're really coming off poorly here and I just can't understand why you are doing it unless you're trying to parody.
I would say 90% of the people who post in talk_politics deserve to be insulted and taunted.
The majority of its userbase (including malasadas) supported the NDAA, supported healthcare reform, supported tax hikes... gun control. They supported every policy that led to the downfall of the united states economy, job market and everything else that sucks over the last few decades.
Remember when I was active around 2008-2009 and I constantly said healthcare reform would fail? That it wouldn't do anything to make healthcare in the united states more affordable or available to americans? And, remember how you, malasadas and the majority of people in that community ridiculed and made fun of me?
Who was right in the end?
I know the truth probably means nothing to you. It means nothing to the moderators of talk_politics who banned me from the community to repress the truth and avoid it being known that they themselves constantly supported things like healthcare reform and other policies that had an extremely negative impact on peoples lives.
For that reason, yes, I do look down on you all. And, I can't say I respect any of you at all.
Can you honestly give me a straight answer to that, without deliberately lying or changing the topic?
You see what I'm saying? None of you ever respond directly to anything.
You pretend that I'm in the wrong for being upset at the fact that your behavior and bad decisions are screwing things up for everyone in this country.
Seeing as how the participation and activity in talk_politics has significantly decreased over time, I would hope there are at least a few who recognize how full of shit you are.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 09:56 pm (UTC)He isn't honest enough and doesn't have the confidence in his own views to explicitly and concisely detail his stance on the topic and plays these childish games where he posts internet memes he thinks are funny to overcompensate for his lack of a personality.
Does that answer your question?
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 10:30 pm (UTC)Avoiding factual statements & refusing to explicitly define your stance on a topic as Malasadas does is unscientific.
Malasadas disagrees with criticism on the affordable care act because he strongly supports the aca.
Yet he is afraid of a burden of proof and refuses to state exactly what his views are on the topic and habitually posts unrelated and offtopic memes.
Those who appreciate and love science do not avoid a burden of proof. They have the courage to explicitly state what their views are on a topic like healthcare reform.
Malasadas avoiding the topic is unscientific and barrs the possibility of real or meaningful discussion on the topic.
No hyperbole required.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 10:36 pm (UTC)I'll take "peeevish" as a derogatory term used against whatever minority we happen to be discriminating against today.
I hear gays are mad they can't get married. Aren't they "peevish"?
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 10:45 pm (UTC)Can't give me a straight answer? That's silly.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-29 12:08 am (UTC)I am willing to admit that all of you who support the ACA and refuse to examine your reasons for doing so, are as unscientific as creationists who believe the earth is 10,000 years old, who also refuse to examine their reasons for believing such.
Are we beginning to approach some relative degree of unscience, nao?
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 11:44 pm (UTC)Unfortunately for me, none of you seem honest enough to admit specifically what your stance is on the topic.
So, we'll have to see whether or not I get to a point where I care eough to dig up your old posts from 2008 - 2009 where you all supported it.
Before you got to a point where you all were too afraid and cowardly to admit the fact.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 11:45 pm (UTC)Clear from what? Use your science, please.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 11:52 pm (UTC)Like I said: I have the balls to admit exactly where I stand on obamacare.
NONE OF YOU can say the same.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-28 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-29 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-29 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-29 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-29 08:41 pm (UTC)Why are you creating some a personal grudge match? This guy you have been recently slinging a shit load of taunts and insults at has some fairly significant credibility. You're really coming off poorly here and I just can't understand why you are doing it unless you're trying to parody.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-14 04:37 am (UTC)I would say 90% of the people who post in
The majority of its userbase (including malasadas) supported the NDAA, supported healthcare reform, supported tax hikes... gun control. They supported every policy that led to the downfall of the united states economy, job market and everything else that sucks over the last few decades.
Remember when I was active around 2008-2009 and I constantly said healthcare reform would fail? That it wouldn't do anything to make healthcare in the united states more affordable or available to americans? And, remember how you, malasadas and the majority of people in that community ridiculed and made fun of me?
Who was right in the end?
I know the truth probably means nothing to you. It means nothing to the moderators of talk_politics who banned me from the community to repress the truth and avoid it being known that they themselves constantly supported things like healthcare reform and other policies that had an extremely negative impact on peoples lives.
For that reason, yes, I do look down on you all. And, I can't say I respect any of you at all.
Can you honestly give me a straight answer to that, without deliberately lying or changing the topic?
You see what I'm saying? None of you ever respond directly to anything.
You pretend that I'm in the wrong for being upset at the fact that your behavior and bad decisions are screwing things up for everyone in this country.
Seeing as how the participation and activity in talk_politics has significantly decreased over time, I would hope there are at least a few who recognize how full of shit you are.