(no subject)

[root-fu.livejournal.com]

Comments

[root-fu.livejournal.com]

Science involves accuracy and fact.

Avoiding factual statements & refusing to explicitly define your stance on a topic as Malasadas does is unscientific.

Malasadas disagrees with criticism on the affordable care act because he strongly supports the aca.

Yet he is afraid of a burden of proof and refuses to state exactly what his views are on the topic and habitually posts unrelated and offtopic memes.

Those who appreciate and love science do not avoid a burden of proof. They have the courage to explicitly state what their views are on a topic like healthcare reform.

Malasadas avoiding the topic is unscientific and barrs the possibility of real or meaningful discussion on the topic.

No hyperbole required.

[new-wave-witch.livejournal.com]

Are you having fun being so silly? I'd hope you are, even though you seem so peevish.

[root-fu.livejournal.com]

What's "silly" about what I said?

I'll take "peeevish" as a derogatory term used against whatever minority we happen to be discriminating against today.

I hear gays are mad they can't get married. Aren't they "peevish"?

[new-wave-witch.livejournal.com]

It's all silly. Your entire attitude is silly. The very foundation upon which you brought your posts is silly.

[root-fu.livejournal.com]

What's silly about it?

Can't give me a straight answer? That's silly.

[new-wave-witch.livejournal.com]

[root-fu.livejournal.com]

Ha. Ok. Compromise.

I am willing to admit that all of you who support the ACA and refuse to examine your reasons for doing so, are as unscientific as creationists who believe the earth is 10,000 years old, who also refuse to examine their reasons for believing such.

Are we beginning to approach some relative degree of unscience, nao?