![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

And here's Sarah Palin at CPAC, demonstrating the childish reactionism that we've come to expect.
Bonus facts:
1) The NYC drink ban didn't include Big Gulps
2) It was struck down by a judge anyway
3) The lovely people of facebook have christened Sarah Palin as "Bible Spice"
no subject
Date: 2013-03-18 08:47 pm (UTC)Sometimes cheap theatrics at a overtly political event matters.
Sarah also took time to rile up gun nuts and birthers, I suppose you approve of that as well.
I have my doubts on the latter, but good on the former - the "gun nuts" need to wake up a bit.
Conservatives could earn respect if they focused on positive solutions instead of such diversions.
They'll never earn the respect of those who don't see such nannying measures as the stupidity they are, nor should they try.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-18 09:08 pm (UTC)I accept that Palin lacks the depth to discuss policy in any meaningful way, more concerning is your belief that focusing on minutiae like the actions of a city mayor is relevant.
The latter part of your comment reflects the hubris that has landed the GOP in the position of election losers yet again so maybe instead of doubling down on their errors, perhaps a strategy change is in order?
no subject
Date: 2013-03-18 09:21 pm (UTC)Regarding the supposed hubris, either you believe it's a belief problem or a message problem. I'm convinced, given the data, that it's the latter.