Nate Silver* had an interesting take on public option support a few weeks ago:
Estimate of districts that support/oppose a public option
blue = support, red = oppose
The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 291 of the 435 Congressional Districts nationwide, or almost exactly two-thirds.
The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 235 of 257 Democratic-held districts.
The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 34 of 52 Blue Dog - held districts, and has overall popularity of 51 percent in these districts versus 39 percent opposed.
BadlydrawnJeff says that doesn't count, since the polling was done by Daily Kos.
But I'm amused at the guys on the right that cite the poll as some justification. What was their rationale in January through June when most polls showed overwhelming support for some form of public option?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:32 pm (UTC)Estimate of districts that support/oppose a public option
blue = support, red = oppose
- The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 291 of the 435 Congressional Districts nationwide, or almost exactly two-thirds.
- The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 235 of 257 Democratic-held districts.
- The public option is estimated to have plurality support in 34 of 52 Blue Dog - held districts, and has overall popularity of 51 percent in these districts versus 39 percent opposed.
*Appeal To Authority FTWno subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:35 pm (UTC)But I'm amused at the guys on the right that cite the poll as some justification. What was their rationale in January through June when most polls showed overwhelming support for some form of public option?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:41 pm (UTC)