Yeah, that's a bunch of crap. As someone who watched it start, watched it evolve, and saw it try and defend itself once it realized what it had done, what this video is claiming is not supported by my first hand accounts, or the copious amounts of evidence about how it started and where it focuses.
Well, given that you posted 3 minutes after I did and the video is 12 minutes long, it's clear that you don't know what's in the video. And she has everything sourced with screenshots, links and such.
I'll take her version over yours, because your side lies and colludes in secret e.g. another secret journalist list.
Yeah, couldn't possibly be that I've been linked it before or anything. I mean the GamerGate trolls have surely not exhibited a penchant for relaying the same tired, debunked, and misguided information repeatedly ad-nauseum or anything. They got sumpthin new all the time...
Yeah.. saw that yesterday. More, I have been paying attention to Gamergate since day one. This is bunk. Gamer gate started because a jerk decided his girlfriend was cheating. He then reported to the net that she was sleeping with a journalist, (debunked) as a way to get revenge. From there, it went to RARHRAGEHATE!!! and personal threats because she dared to have an affair. It was never about the writer cheating for her, it was about her daring to have sex, and be a game writer.
Typical character assassination by the left. I can't wait to see what you Obama shills do to Snowden if he comes back. Poor kid will be a racist pedophile mass murderer by the time you're done with him.
Oh please. The title of the article starts off with "The Kardashian lookalike...". What the fuck is that? She is not a Kardashian lookalike but the idea is to make her seem trite and frivolous even though her entire video was backed up with citations and links and documents and such. This is a typical tactic of your side, the enemies of civilization.
But that doesn't mean it's factual or accurate. Her video is total crap, biased propaganda with copious amounts of evidence demonstrating such. You just want to believe her, and that makes you wrong.
This is clearly all about a marxist->darpa->Video game mind control thought police! HAHAHAHAHA!
The argument that they are ignoring games that have strong women characters: Of course they are focusing on the sexist games and excluding the others, they are primarily concerned with the sexist games.
"What you’re looking at is the absolute kind of unethical dealing which GamerGate is railing against… and yet they haven’t mobilized against it. Zoe Quinn’s personal information is being posted on 8chan.co, the scumbag message board for people who think slimepit 4chan isn’t lenient enough, every day. Quinn isn’t a journalist. Quinn didn’t engage in payola. Real payola has happened, is happening and GamerGate is silent on it. Why aren't these YouTubers getting doxxed?
Because GamerGate isn’t about ethics. It’s about stopping women from having voices, it’s about keeping progressive ideas out of games and it’s about attacking any kind of game that doesn’t fit the mainstream, shoot-em-up vision of video games these deeply emotionally stunted people have.
They’ve already lost their own battle as they roll over on true ethical lapses. But more than that, they’ve lost the PR war. The second everyone assumed the Utah threat came from a Gamergater they lost. Their entire campaign has been defined to mean one thing, and one thing only - harassment of women. The more they claim otherwise the more bizarre they come across, like when you hear Klansmen say they don’t hate black people, they’re just proud of being white. You wonder who they think they’re fooling."
#stopgamergate (https://twitter.com/hashtag/stopgamergate?src=hash) because they believe advice about a $50 entertainment purchase is worth more than the privacy of a person's sexual history.
— Adam Ruch (@adamruch) October 16, 2014 (https://twitter.com/adamruch/status/522661036113940482)
FYI, your cut tag doesn't actually cut the second two images. You've got your end-cut tag paired with your cut tag so all three appear outside the cut.
The key is that two people have shitty, reactionary, abusive reactions, then in the middle go, "How can I trust game reviews?" "That's all I'm sayin'" It's disjointed, idiotic spew
Its unclear to me as well. But from what I have gleaned, a woman complains on interwebs about snuff porn in video games, and complains about it in a video series, and then is constantly doxxed, raped threated, and death threated all to prove there is no sexism problem.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 10:45 pm (UTC)I'll take her version over yours, because your side lies and colludes in secret e.g. another secret journalist list.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 08:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 08:24 am (UTC)Funny, because most of the people they've attacked weren't on that e-mail list.
You are just trolling at this point.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 11:35 am (UTC)You might want to try to be honest.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:31 am (UTC)http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/17/the-kardashian-look-a-like-trolling-for-assad.html
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-21 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:00 am (UTC)Sounds legit.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:42 pm (UTC)Here, I will do it for others as well:
Alex Jones is a nut.
Cynthia McKinnon is a nut.
Anyone who reads NaturalNews and takes it seriously is a nut.
You posted something on a topic you obviously know very little about that was put together by a person who is a nut.
Your bad. Not mine.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 03:07 pm (UTC)So is this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE
But that doesn't mean it's factual or accurate. Her video is total crap, biased propaganda with copious amounts of evidence demonstrating such. You just want to believe her, and that makes you wrong.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 06:39 pm (UTC)Oh, and to anticipate your response: "Hurr. Durr. You statists never admit that the government does anything wrong. Derpy Hurr Durr Durr."
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 05:24 pm (UTC)Sounds like someone doesn't know how GamerGate functions.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-21 09:51 am (UTC)The argument that they are ignoring games that have strong women characters: Of course they are focusing on the sexist games and excluding the others, they are primarily concerned with the sexist games.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 10:32 pm (UTC)Because GamerGate isn’t about ethics. It’s about stopping women from having voices, it’s about keeping progressive ideas out of games and it’s about attacking any kind of game that doesn’t fit the mainstream, shoot-em-up vision of video games these deeply emotionally stunted people have.
They’ve already lost their own battle as they roll over on true ethical lapses. But more than that, they’ve lost the PR war. The second everyone assumed the Utah threat came from a Gamergater they lost. Their entire campaign has been defined to mean one thing, and one thing only - harassment of women. The more they claim otherwise the more bizarre they come across, like when you hear Klansmen say they don’t hate black people, they’re just proud of being white. You wonder who they think they’re fooling."
http://badassdigest.com/2014/10/15/why-gamergate-already-lost
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-21 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-21 09:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-23 03:59 am (UTC)