(no subject)

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

Comments

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

1. Recess appointment using executive order
2. Turley did, he showed that that executive branch created laws, and this falls under "imperial" category.
3. How much money they make while doing that?
Here I'll differ with you and it is an opinion, so neither of us can prove right or wrong. Don't give a fish but a fishing net. You know what I mean.

[fizzyland.livejournal.com]

1. You have that so wrong, there's no going past it. Recess appointments aren't Executive Orders. They're appointments made when congress in in recess. The ruling against the President said that Congress technically wasn't in recess, despite them not being in chambers or doing any work. Get the terminology right.

2) You've yet to back Turley's claims with say, any source material.

3) They get paid the same as anyone else in Congress.

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

1. That's not me.
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-defiant-after-supreme-court-rules-against-his-executive-order-appointments
2. Maybe some other time. I feel lazy today. Can't you do the work for me? Did you hear his testimony in congress? I keep forgetting that you're not a TV person, should be documented somewhere. You want to see Turley thought flow, right?
3. What they get as a salary, just a change, that's not what I'm talking about at all. They make the money through the deals. For example, did you know that the husband of our senator got the crazy train contract?