I'd like to see a similar one based on congressional polarization, running beside it and synced, so we can track lags and responsiveness to public opinion in congress.
By conservatives realizing that their "rugged individualism" isn't actually a possible way for humans to live; we are social creatures by nature. Randian ethics, which is the cult of the American right wing, makes the mistake of failing to universalize respect for personhood, ignorantly thinking that you can truly respect yourself if you don't respect others.
How is that bizzare? Maybe you are just that self-unaware ... wow ... anyway, many American right-wingers certainly ascribe to Randian ethics, which is where the whole problem begins.
New Marijuana Study Says Everyone Knows You're High And You'll Likely Be Stoned Forever (http://www.theonion.com/video/new-marijuana-study-says-everyone-knows-youre-high,35386/?playlist=recent-news)
You're right, Unnamed hasn't really described "Randian ethics" - coherently or otherwise. Your intimation that he's somehow gotten it wrong is unwarranted.
But in any case, Unnamed is broadly correct in stating that "right wingers" inappropriately treat the "individual" as the sole foundational unit of society and unduly over-emphasize, to the point of fetishization, the importance of such "individual's" "freedom," which is nearly always defined by "right wingers" in some question-begging way.
The only reason the philosophical incoherence of "right wingers'" worldview doesn't result in a self-perpetuating feedback loop of increasing incoherence and raving idiocy - if it doesn't result in that, which I think is still an open question - it's because "right wingers" turn out to be their own worst examples. Cf., e.g., open-carriers in Starbucks, state legislators proudly campaigning on anti-science platforms, you, etc.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 09:26 pm (UTC)I'd like to see a similar one based on congressional polarization, running beside it and synced, so we can track lags and responsiveness to public opinion in congress.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:34 pm (UTC)and have a real civil war.
No more speechifying, but gunfire!
no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 11:36 pm (UTC)Everybody must get stoned.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-19 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-20 12:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-20 01:05 am (UTC)Ayn Rand’s Harry Potter and The Sorcerer’s Stone (http://the-toast.net/2014/05/27/ayn-rands-harry-potter-sorcerers-stone/)
no subject
Date: 2014-06-20 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-20 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-20 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-20 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-20 01:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-20 01:52 am (UTC)But in any case, Unnamed is broadly correct in stating that "right wingers" inappropriately treat the "individual" as the sole foundational unit of society and unduly over-emphasize, to the point of fetishization, the importance of such "individual's" "freedom," which is nearly always defined by "right wingers" in some question-begging way.
The only reason the philosophical incoherence of "right wingers'" worldview doesn't result in a self-perpetuating feedback loop of increasing incoherence and raving idiocy - if it doesn't result in that, which I think is still an open question - it's because "right wingers" turn out to be their own worst examples. Cf., e.g., open-carriers in Starbucks, state legislators proudly campaigning on anti-science platforms, you, etc.