Page 1 of 12 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] >>

Date: 2014-06-19 09:25 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-19 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chron-job.livejournal.com
Interesting!

I'd like to see a similar one based on congressional polarization, running beside it and synced, so we can track lags and responsiveness to public opinion in congress.
Edited Date: 2014-06-19 09:26 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-19 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wight1984.livejournal.com
Any thoughts about how this trend could be averted?

Date: 2014-06-19 10:02 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-19 10:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
By conservatives realizing that their "rugged individualism" isn't actually a possible way for humans to live; we are social creatures by nature. Randian ethics, which is the cult of the American right wing, makes the mistake of failing to universalize respect for personhood, ignorantly thinking that you can truly respect yourself if you don't respect others.

Date: 2014-06-19 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
Voteview.org (http://voteview.com/political_polarization.asp)

Date: 2014-06-19 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com
Yeah, maybe we can become more like Iraq
and have a real civil war.

No more speechifying, but gunfire!

Date: 2014-06-19 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Is there some Extremist Island for you and your ilk to live on then?

Date: 2014-06-19 10:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
What's the data source?

Date: 2014-06-19 11:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
How is that bizzare? Maybe you are just that self-unaware ... wow ... anyway, many American right-wingers certainly ascribe to Randian ethics, which is where the whole problem begins.

Date: 2014-06-19 11:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Randian ethics with a few exceptions, like stoning gays.
Edited Date: 2014-06-19 11:35 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-19 11:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
I would not feel so all alone ...
Everybody must get stoned.

Date: 2014-06-19 11:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
New Marijuana Study Says Everyone Knows You're High And You'll Likely Be Stoned Forever (http://www.theonion.com/video/new-marijuana-study-says-everyone-knows-youre-high,35386/?playlist=recent-news)
Edited Date: 2014-06-20 12:49 am (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-19 11:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oslo.livejournal.com
I'll believe you when you move to one of the highly-polarized red states.

Date: 2014-06-20 12:50 am (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-20 01:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
But enough frivolity!
Ayn Rand’s Harry Potter and The Sorcerer’s Stone (http://the-toast.net/2014/05/27/ayn-rands-harry-potter-sorcerers-stone/)
Edited Date: 2014-06-20 01:08 am (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-20 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madam-shapo.livejournal.com
Averted? Why? Right direction.

Date: 2014-06-20 01:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
All issues are either left or right?

Date: 2014-06-20 01:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/

Date: 2014-06-20 01:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
So, no seeking common ground or solutions that suit both sides? Instead we should just take more extreme positions until what?

Date: 2014-06-20 01:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oslo.livejournal.com
You're right, Unnamed hasn't really described "Randian ethics" - coherently or otherwise. Your intimation that he's somehow gotten it wrong is unwarranted.

But in any case, Unnamed is broadly correct in stating that "right wingers" inappropriately treat the "individual" as the sole foundational unit of society and unduly over-emphasize, to the point of fetishization, the importance of such "individual's" "freedom," which is nearly always defined by "right wingers" in some question-begging way.

The only reason the philosophical incoherence of "right wingers'" worldview doesn't result in a self-perpetuating feedback loop of increasing incoherence and raving idiocy - if it doesn't result in that, which I think is still an open question - it's because "right wingers" turn out to be their own worst examples. Cf., e.g., open-carriers in Starbucks, state legislators proudly campaigning on anti-science platforms, you, etc.
Page 1 of 12 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] >>

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 01:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios