(no subject)
Jun. 11th, 2014 07:07 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
So about "big money" "buying elections"... pic.twitter.com/k4v6FovWQh #VA07
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) June 11, 2014
So about "big money" "buying elections"... pic.twitter.com/k4v6FovWQh #VA07
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) June 11, 2014
no subject
Date: 2014-06-11 09:08 pm (UTC)in this election, per the immigration issue
That's a bit of a reach.
and in a district
drawn to get the most of the 'most conservative' elements'
in the region, that had a way of triumphing over money.
In a sense. Surely, if money was king as I'm told so often in so many places, Brat shouldn't have even challenged!
no subject
Date: 2014-06-11 09:14 pm (UTC)by media conservatives, such as Laura Ingraham and others.
I suppose that is worth some money in the bank, especially
in a right-wing district.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-11 09:20 pm (UTC)The best recaps I've seen from the race has a lot more to do with Cantor's constituent relations and his seeming entitlement for the job. I'm sure his moderate tendencies (at least for the district) and immigration certainly drove some voters, but it kind of reminds me of a race out here in 2010 where Barney Frank seemed vulnerable and then when we heard a lot of people credit his constituent outreach, it was a difference-maker in a lot of regards. Not going to matter in most races, but if it's really significant in either direction, it can make a difference.