All I did was counter your point with a quote which, regardless of whether it is so well known as be called cliche, is STILL VALID.
Chill. What part of "devil's advocate" went way above YOUR dumb-assed head? Just because I comment doesn't mean I give a shit to what philosophy you subscribe to.
Nice how you bitch about wanting discourse, then fail to actually counter, AND resort to cursing/name calling. You lose at teh internuts.
1) You are arguing with the WRONG PERSON DIP-SHIT. Give HIM the fucking quote, not ME.
2) This argument is way beyond you cognitive abilities. I am against the death penalty for fuck sake. Do you not realize that I am pointing out to the other dip shit that HIS extremism is barely any different from that of those who blew up London? FUCK.
3) The name calling is appropriate since you are INDEED a dip shit. In this case it is not an insult but a statement of FACT.
Wow, check yourself before you reply. I'm not yelling or conversing with the other person. I'm not yelling at you. I responded to your eye for an eye comment 'cause I think the concept is obnoxious. That's it. No, your motivations were not entirely clear by your comment, but I didn't give a damn. I was only reponding to your use of a cliche phrase.
I probably wasn't the nicest in doing it, but I don't think I diserve your abuse. Just chill. It's a dead issue.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: <> Devil's advocate
Date: 2005-07-08 07:17 pm (UTC)His beliefs are of no use when force has already been exercised.
-and see if you can use a quote that I have not heard over a gajillion times.
Re: <> Devil's advocate
Date: 2005-07-08 11:53 pm (UTC)Oh, and remember, you still have your Godwin's Law lifeline, among other copouts to avoid real discussion!
Re: <> Devil's advocate
Date: 2005-07-09 02:01 am (UTC)What part of "devil's advocate" went way above your dumb-assed head?
..and regardless, the quote is still a cliche.
Re: <> Devil's advocate
Date: 2005-07-09 02:10 am (UTC)Chill. What part of "devil's advocate" went way above YOUR dumb-assed head? Just because I comment doesn't mean I give a shit to what philosophy you subscribe to.
Nice how you bitch about wanting discourse, then fail to actually counter, AND resort to cursing/name calling. You lose at teh internuts.
Re: <> Devil's advocate
Date: 2005-07-09 02:15 am (UTC)2) This argument is way beyond you cognitive abilities. I am against the death penalty for fuck sake. Do you not realize that I am pointing out to the other dip shit that HIS extremism is barely any different from that of those who blew up London? FUCK.
3) The name calling is appropriate since you are INDEED a dip shit. In this case it is not an insult but a statement of FACT.
Re: <> Devil's advocate
Date: 2005-07-09 02:56 am (UTC)I probably wasn't the nicest in doing it, but I don't think I diserve your abuse. Just chill. It's a dead issue.
Re: <> Devil's advocate
Date: 2005-07-09 12:30 am (UTC)Re: <> Devil's advocate
Date: 2005-07-09 02:10 am (UTC)Try to find the remaining text/context from where his quote was originally taken and THEN come back.