Re: <> Devil's advocate

Date: 2005-07-08 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i-muad-dib.livejournal.com
Gandhi was a commy fag.
His beliefs are of no use when force has already been exercised.

-and see if you can use a quote that I have not heard over a gajillion times.

Re: <> Devil's advocate

Date: 2005-07-08 11:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groundbyground.livejournal.com
Neither his ideological affiliations, nor the popularity of his sayings affect that the statement is true. But, thanks for playing!

Oh, and remember, you still have your Godwin's Law lifeline, among other copouts to avoid real discussion!

Re: <> Devil's advocate

Date: 2005-07-09 02:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i-muad-dib.livejournal.com
Try to understand something, dip shit: I DO NOT SUBSCRVE TO AN EYE FOR AN EYE.
What part of "devil's advocate" went way above your dumb-assed head?

..and regardless, the quote is still a cliche.

Re: <> Devil's advocate

Date: 2005-07-09 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groundbyground.livejournal.com
All I did was counter your point with a quote which, regardless of whether it is so well known as be called cliche, is STILL VALID.

Chill. What part of "devil's advocate" went way above YOUR dumb-assed head? Just because I comment doesn't mean I give a shit to what philosophy you subscribe to.

Nice how you bitch about wanting discourse, then fail to actually counter, AND resort to cursing/name calling. You lose at teh internuts.

Re: <> Devil's advocate

Date: 2005-07-09 02:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i-muad-dib.livejournal.com
1) You are arguing with the WRONG PERSON DIP-SHIT. Give HIM the fucking quote, not ME.

2) This argument is way beyond you cognitive abilities. I am against the death penalty for fuck sake. Do you not realize that I am pointing out to the other dip shit that HIS extremism is barely any different from that of those who blew up London? FUCK.

3) The name calling is appropriate since you are INDEED a dip shit. In this case it is not an insult but a statement of FACT.

Re: <> Devil's advocate

Date: 2005-07-09 02:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groundbyground.livejournal.com
Wow, check yourself before you reply. I'm not yelling or conversing with the other person. I'm not yelling at you. I responded to your eye for an eye comment 'cause I think the concept is obnoxious. That's it. No, your motivations were not entirely clear by your comment, but I didn't give a damn. I was only reponding to your use of a cliche phrase.

I probably wasn't the nicest in doing it, but I don't think I diserve your abuse. Just chill. It's a dead issue.

Re: <> Devil's advocate

Date: 2005-07-09 12:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goumindong.livejournal.com
places where violence had already been excercized? Like India?

Re: <> Devil's advocate

Date: 2005-07-09 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i-muad-dib.livejournal.com
Holy shit. You are fucking dumb.
Try to find the remaining text/context from where his quote was originally taken and THEN come back.

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 11:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios