![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

The College Board recently announced a shift in how the SAT will gauge students’ talent for vocabulary. The days when a commitment to flash cards could get young people a good score are coming to an end in 2015. Starting in 2016, students won’t be asked about obscure, 10-dollar words with fill-in-the-blank questions; they’ll be asked about “high utility” words, much more common terms with multiple meanings that can only be identified by looking at the word’s context.
-- How Would You Do On the New SAT Vocabulary Questions?
no subject
Date: 2014-04-20 10:36 pm (UTC)In my defense, I DO have a BA in English (as well as an MA in Library/Information Studies), and I've always read voraciously. And I suck at math. (As in, didn't even pass freshman algebra in high school--mind you, there IS an explanation for that, but it's a rather long story). So if I wasn't pretty damned good at verbal stuff, I'd be a pretty pathetic human being! (Or feel like one, anyway.)
no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-24 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 09:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 01:47 am (UTC)(He said, as someone who hasn't been in high school for a very long time.)
I *think* I would have aced it then, as now. Because man, those questions were easy. But they were also vocabulary questions, and very simple vocabulary questions, and very simple vocabulary questions GIVEN CONTEXT. And I read, so.
But it's easy to miss "are you as smart as a 5th grader" style questions, because the questions you expect a 13-yo to memorise the answers to are not the questions you expect an adult to answer.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-24 01:26 am (UTC)