(no subject)

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

It is beyond imagination that anyone could misconstrue the Soviet agitprop in Jay Carney's kitchen as an indication that White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and his wife somehow share the same ideas as the perpetrators of a brutal regime that starved its own citizens while the political elites lived in luxury, abused power, prosecuted the opposition, and ruled the country by means of executive orders.

Next, they would claim that that a neat stack of Chairman Mao's Little Red Books in Valery Jarrett's bathroom is not there merely to serve as an elegant accent to complement the shower curtains; or that the Black Panther Party insignia on Michelle Obama's pajamas isn't merely a bold decorative pattern; or that the black flag of holy Jihad in Huma Abedin's bedroom is somehow indicative of her sympathies towards the Muslim Brotherhood.

Following such flawed right-wing logic, one might even speculate that Saul Alinsky's books on Hillary Clinton's living room mean anything other than an effort to disguise an obscure dried spot that had mysteriously appeared on the coffee table in the last year of her husband's presidency.

Comments

[mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com]

also, what makes minor drug offenses an acceptable crime but political speech an unacceptable crime?

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

"Also", not "also".
Whatever is written in criminal code... Who I am to create my own laws?

[mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com]

Whatever is written in criminal code... Who I am to create my own laws?

It's just odd that you have strong feelings about gulags when it came to making political speech illegal but apathy toward the more modern prison industrial complex when it comes to minor drug use offenses.

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

FYI, there was nothing about gulags in soviet constitution, actually they were totally illegal. Why I have to teach you so many things? I don't mind though, as long as you promise to be a good student.

[mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com]

FYI, there was nothing about gulags in soviet constitution, actually they were totally illegal.

Wouldn't that mean communism isn't evil, because those actions went against the soviet constitution?

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

Socialism, not communism. The problem with socialism is that it is not a feasible system. The evil - the methods allowed and encouraged by the societies. Actually, you might got me here. I have to think about this.
So getting onto another topic-what horrible consequences not following the law could bring upon us. Don't you agree?

[mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com]

If gulags are unconstitutional, what makes the art evil? Is it pictures of happy gulags?

I'll give you that: pictures that make gulags look positive are bad form. Did Jay own art depicting happy gulags?

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

The posters were made by evil regime. Jay own art, it's not art-it's a poster; you are confusing me now. He owns a poster made by evil regime, which perpetrated suffering and deaths on millions of people. Also, I think, there is big difference between owning something and putting it on the wall for everyday observation.

[mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com]

The regime owned all cultural norms and artistic styles during that era?

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

Not all, but this one was produced by the regime 100%-it is a propaganda piece.

[mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com]

So it's not that style of art, but that specific work itself?

[madam-shapo.livejournal.com]

Both.