(no subject)

[pacotelic.livejournal.com]

Comments

[byrontengu.livejournal.com]

Wow... check the archives, duck then cover.

[foolsguinea.livejournal.com]

Hey, man, don't be draggin' Phoenix Jones inta this.

[donolectic.livejournal.com]

This.

[sable-twilight.livejournal.com]

Wait, they were both having sexitimes with someone underaged. Shouldn't they both be pepper sprayed, zapped and locked up?

[pacotelic.livejournal.com]

Come to think of it, the act of childbirth is a kind of sexual harassment.

TAZINGS FOR ALL!

[byrontengu.livejournal.com]

entrapment perhaps?

[byrontengu.livejournal.com]

Not if one of them brought a penis.

[sable-twilight.livejournal.com]

sophia_daniels explained it as the remnants of property laws, since children are still considered the property of their parents.

"she'd only get in trouble if she was taking photos of herself. otherwise she's the illegal property in question. she has to activly take ownership of her body before the law will assume she's not somebody elses property. either way her body is the illegal controband. and the assumption is the boy is the owner of that property. or at least he's trying to missuse her parent's property."

"but yeah. age of consent laws are there to protect the property of the fathers.... they didn't want other men spoiling their young virgins. because people are in fact property. no matter how much we try to pretend we're not. it's either our bodies are our property, or just blatent people as property."