Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
Is that Osama crying in the picture? - I makes no sense cos Bush called off searching for him and let him go free. Remember Bush said, "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." 3/13/02 and, "I am truly not that concerned about him." 3/13/02) If Osama is in the picture he should be happy cos he is free to do whatever he wants cos Bush really doesn't care. He said so.
I guess that must mean he's free to go. He must not have to hide in caves in Afghanistan dodging bombs anymore. Lucky him.
It was nice of America to completely call off the hunt for him. Now he can hatch his next plan to attack us, all because Bush doesn't want to catch him, right?
I dunno - Bush said he really doesn't care. I still say Osama would be smiling cos he got away with murder. I don't feel good about that but I bet Osama does. I bet he was so relieved when he heard that Bush said he doesn't really care about it. So he shouldn't be crying in the picture. He should be smiling like someone who got away with murder.
Though liberal, I find your icon extremely funny. And yes, the media is biased. There is a spectrum for everything. Fox is on one side, CBS on the other. But CBS gets/got more bad press for it.
Maybe Bush said he really doesn't care so that people wouldn't notice so much that he has failed. Maybe it's the CIA that has failed. But our failure to catch Osama after over three years is not what I am arguing about. All that I'm saying is that Osama would be smiling because he is free and has gotten away with murder.
Osama would be smiling because after he allegedly masterminded a brutal attack on American soil, killing thousands of Americans and destroying billions in property, he remains free and has gotten away with murder. Bush said he really doesn't care, he's not that concerned, it's not that important. He is the president and these are his words - and he wouldn't say something really stupid unless he meant it. And so Osama would be smiling because he is happy and free.
Ah yes, just like the three or four times Clinton literally had Osama in his sights, and just thought "Ah, maybe another day...". Guess Osama's got it good whoever's in office.
If you look closely at the cartoon, there are a number of clues that indicate that this is Bush's inauguration, it is Bush we are talking about. It was Bush who got the warnings of Osama's intent to strike on American soil and ignored them. It was during Bush's presidency that Osama made his brutal attack on American soil, and for over three years Bush has failed to capture Osama. But Bush said it's really not important. Why would he say it's not important?
Now why is Osama bin Laden in this picture? He's way too violent to ever be liberal. Speaking of which, why are multiple world dictators in that picture? Are you assuming that because we're anti-Bush that we're pro-terrorist?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 07:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 09:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 10:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 05:48 am (UTC)Oops.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 09:58 pm (UTC)The truth is always Fair and Balanced.
the facts have a liberal bias.
Date: 2005-01-23 10:46 pm (UTC)if you want me to dig up reasons why fox is more biased than any other news network, i'd be glad. just ask.
Re: the facts have a liberal bias.
From:Re: the facts have a liberal bias.
From:Re: the facts have a liberal bias.
From:Re: the facts have a liberal bias.
From:Re: the facts have a liberal bias.
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 10:46 pm (UTC)I guess that must mean he's free to go. He must not have to hide in caves in Afghanistan dodging bombs anymore. Lucky him.
It was nice of America to completely call off the hunt for him. Now he can hatch his next plan to attack us, all because Bush doesn't want to catch him, right?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 04:54 pm (UTC)And yes, the media is biased. There is a spectrum for everything. Fox is on one side, CBS on the other.
But CBS gets/got more bad press for it.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 05:37 pm (UTC)That sure explains why the CIA has an entire unit devoted to finding him.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 08:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 05:37 pm (UTC)You're really sharp...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 08:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 09:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 05:20 am (UTC)Funny.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 06:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 07:58 am (UTC)simply love it!