trying to argue which Abranatic religion is more inherently violent, both Christianity and Islam have a long list of atrocities to each name. To argue which one is worse is incredibly boring to me.
Religion does not excuse humanity. People treat religion as if it's the cause of all the evil in the world. It's not, if there was no religion, there would still be just as much evil. It would find some other outlet.
The evil would be on a far more diffuse scale. There's nothing to inspire mass hatred and prejudice by a people or against a people than to convince everyone around you that the creator of the universe is on your side.
The Hatfields and the McCoys, or national wars over land or resources would be about the worst you would get without religion. You would cut out an entire reason for people to get their panties in a twist.
Its all wishful thinking, though. Religion, like the poor, will always be with us. One lacks money, the other lacks thought.
Pol Pot: Class war against the wealthy and well-educated, ostensibly in the quest for rice
Stalin: Couldn't kill that many through purges if he tried. Probably well under 500k killed through wrath of Stalin. Most of that 60 mil was due to incredibly bad agricultural policy and drought. Lysenko probably killed the majority of that 60 mil.
Hitler: Actually closer to 13 million, but 6 million were singled out for their religion and nothing but. I'm fuzzy o the details, but I think some other flavors of catholicism were singeld out as well for the final solution.
You're making the point that these are not religiosu deceptions, but political ones. Its akin to saying that Islam is not a religion, but a political movement. Fair point, but religion is still being used as the thing to rally around and do unto others whatever you can get away with.
Well of course its wrong, by definition. Hypocrisy makes the world go around, though. I can't name a single person who lives with total consistency of words and deeds.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-14 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:54 am (UTC)trying to argue which Abranatic religion is more inherently violent, both Christianity and Islam have a long list of atrocities to each name. To argue which one is worse is incredibly boring to me.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 01:00 pm (UTC)The Hatfields and the McCoys, or national wars over land or resources would be about the worst you would get without religion. You would cut out an entire reason for people to get their panties in a twist.
Its all wishful thinking, though. Religion, like the poor, will always be with us. One lacks money, the other lacks thought.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 04:59 pm (UTC)Pol Pot - 2,000,000 dead in the killing fields
Stalin - up to 60,000,000 dead in the great purges.
Hitler - 6,000,000+ dead in the holocaust
All done without religion.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 05:12 pm (UTC)Stalin: Couldn't kill that many through purges if he tried. Probably well under 500k killed through wrath of Stalin. Most of that 60 mil was due to incredibly bad agricultural policy and drought. Lysenko probably killed the majority of that 60 mil.
Hitler: Actually closer to 13 million, but 6 million were singled out for their religion and nothing but. I'm fuzzy o the details, but I think some other flavors of catholicism were singeld out as well for the final solution.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-17 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-17 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-16 05:23 pm (UTC)