Net Neutrality
Oct. 28th, 2009 07:53 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
"Now what they would like to do is use my pipes free, but I ain't going to let them do that because we have spent this capital and we have to have a return on it. So there's going to have to be some mechanism for these people who use these pipes to pay for the portion they're using. Why should they be allowed to use my pipes?"
-- Ed Whitacre, CEO of AT&T

Edit: This isn't a real ad. It's a joke. Laugh.
-- Ed Whitacre, CEO of AT&T

Edit: This isn't a real ad. It's a joke. Laugh.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 01:26 am (UTC)Do a little research, look up the AMA and "lodge doctors." (http://www.fff.org/freedom/1201e.asp) If you like the health care industry that exists in this country today you will love the Internet you get after congress and the big telcos get through with it.
Why does freedom scare you so much?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 02:34 am (UTC)So they promise "blazing" download speeds, but if everyone actually used it all you'd find out very fast that they cannot support what they are selling and you'd end up only getting the 5 or so megs the telco can actually provide. It's like putting an 8 lane onramp on a two lane highway. If they charged a realistic price you might end up paying as much for a five meg pipe as you currently do for 50, but you really wouldn't see an actual performance difference since all most people are doing is surfing the web and checking email and the people who really want or need 50 megs would have to pay for it. As the AT&T slug said, net neutrality really is about everyone else subsidizing the heavy users. What AT&T doesn't want you to know is that in the aggregate they can't really provide what they are selling.
The company I work for does not do residential, but the principle is the same. At first blush our potential customers wonder why we charge more for a smaller pipe than the big guys. The difference is if every one of our customers used every bit of their bandwidth all the time our infrastructure can support it because we don't sell bandwidth we don't have. If someone wants a 100 meg pipe we charge them to build it out and pay for their usage not the rest of our customers.
We have business customers who have 20 or 30 users on a 10 meg pipe and they never complain about it being slow till some jerk decides to use his "free" internet connection at work to download a bunch of mp3 or porn on his boss's dime.
There are a whole lot of supposedly tech savvy users who really have no idea how IP transit works. Politicians love ignorance, it gives them power.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 04:06 pm (UTC)at some point, you end up going through large telco routers and switches. There will still be limitations imposed.