The problem with any poll these days is that "public option" is nebulous. Should there be a free medical plan that Americans can use that costs tax money? Well, that depends on the plan....
...if it costs so much that it raises taxes for all Americans? ...if it runs all competing plans out of business?
Until we have an actual plan to debate, all these polls are meaningless.
yes to all of the above. 1-there should be one. 2-it will raise taxes, but lower your personal cost by more. 3-if it does that, it means it's cheaper and better.
i'm sure the debate will be really meaningful: "I now recognize the distinguished senator from the right side of the chamber." "OMG!DEATH PANEL!SOCIALISM!KILLING YOUR GRANDMA!MUSLIM!911! I reserve the right to revise and extend my remarks."
Small nitpick, though I agree with you in general: Currently, I have no personal cost for my insurance, nor have I ever had one. It is a condition of my employment, and it is paid by my employer. It is also important to point out that this puts me in the majority of Americans.
Also, like the majority of Americans, I'm ok with paying some taxes to get health care fro those who need it. But I'd like to know how much I'm paying, and whether I'll be able to keep my current policy that I like instead of forced to use the public option.
Right, most Americans currently have coverage that lets them be dropped, or not cared for existing conditions, or have caps on payments, or prevents them from moving to another job that may not have health insurance.
Hey, if we want to change this to the "Reform the Insurance Companies Bill" I'm on board. But it seems that the powers that be are getting a bit too much money from the insurance lobby to do so. I can say that I and my family have never had problems in our insurance companies, but I recognize that problems exist in the system and it would be good to fix them.
Although I should state that any decent job I've ever seen has health insurance of varying degrees of effectiveness as part of the benefits. Much like vacation time, it seems to be a pretty standard benefit for any job that carries a decent salary.
technically, getting everyone care so they don't use the emergency rooms at everyone else's expense should lower your employer's (and my wife's employer's) cost so that they can actually pay you a higher salary. i don't believe any plan out there mandates plan or doctor changes. from what i heard, the CBO estimates that after ten years, 10 million people would be on the public option. small potatoes.
?? My employer's coverage costs me plenty. If they didn't have to cover me they could afford to pay me more. (Barring y'know, them being assholes, which is never a given.) And most of us with employer coverage pay about a third of the total premium deducted from our paycheck anyway, so, really really not "no personal cost."
I've had plans that did either. My current plan costs me nothing (though my employer is paying SOMETHING for it). My concern, however, is that employers will find it simpler to force all of their employers to the plan, meaning that every American is now on one plan.
Is that likely? No. Is it possible? Sure. I'm hoping they will formulate a good plan that gives those without a chance while still letting those who are paying or are subsidized by their employer to get care above and beyond the public plan.
The lost job scenario is exactly what COBRA was created for. But yes, I recognize that there are holes in the system. Like I said, I'd MUCH prefer we did a complete overhaul of the insurance system, but the lawmakers don't seem keen on that. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:39 pm (UTC)...if it costs so much that it raises taxes for all Americans?
...if it runs all competing plans out of business?
Until we have an actual plan to debate, all these polls are meaningless.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:46 pm (UTC)1-there should be one.
2-it will raise taxes, but lower your personal cost by more.
3-if it does that, it means it's cheaper and better.
i'm sure the debate will be really meaningful:
"I now recognize the distinguished senator from the right side of the chamber."
"OMG!DEATH PANEL!SOCIALISM!KILLING YOUR GRANDMA!MUSLIM!911! I reserve the right to revise and extend my remarks."
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:52 pm (UTC)Also, like the majority of Americans, I'm ok with paying some taxes to get health care fro those who need it. But I'd like to know how much I'm paying, and whether I'll be able to keep my current policy that I like instead of forced to use the public option.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 07:15 pm (UTC)Although I should state that any decent job I've ever seen has health insurance of varying degrees of effectiveness as part of the benefits. Much like vacation time, it seems to be a pretty standard benefit for any job that carries a decent salary.
Thanks
Date: 2009-09-30 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:04 am (UTC)Is that likely? No. Is it possible? Sure. I'm hoping they will formulate a good plan that gives those without a chance while still letting those who are paying or are subsidized by their employer to get care above and beyond the public plan.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:06 am (UTC)