[identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] politicartoons


There'll be a public option in the final bill, and President Obama will sign it before Christmas. :-)

Date: 2009-09-30 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] donkeyjon.livejournal.com
The problem with any poll these days is that "public option" is nebulous. Should there be a free medical plan that Americans can use that costs tax money? Well, that depends on the plan....

...if it costs so much that it raises taxes for all Americans?
...if it runs all competing plans out of business?

Until we have an actual plan to debate, all these polls are meaningless.

Date: 2009-09-30 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] donkeyjon.livejournal.com
I left out many options, but yes, if what you say is true, I'd support it.

Date: 2009-09-30 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com
yes to all of the above.
1-there should be one.
2-it will raise taxes, but lower your personal cost by more.
3-if it does that, it means it's cheaper and better.

i'm sure the debate will be really meaningful:
"I now recognize the distinguished senator from the right side of the chamber."
"OMG!DEATH PANEL!SOCIALISM!KILLING YOUR GRANDMA!MUSLIM!911! I reserve the right to revise and extend my remarks."

Date: 2009-09-30 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] donkeyjon.livejournal.com
Small nitpick, though I agree with you in general: Currently, I have no personal cost for my insurance, nor have I ever had one. It is a condition of my employment, and it is paid by my employer. It is also important to point out that this puts me in the majority of Americans.

Also, like the majority of Americans, I'm ok with paying some taxes to get health care fro those who need it. But I'd like to know how much I'm paying, and whether I'll be able to keep my current policy that I like instead of forced to use the public option.

Date: 2009-09-30 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] donkeyjon.livejournal.com
Hey, if we want to change this to the "Reform the Insurance Companies Bill" I'm on board. But it seems that the powers that be are getting a bit too much money from the insurance lobby to do so. I can say that I and my family have never had problems in our insurance companies, but I recognize that problems exist in the system and it would be good to fix them.

Although I should state that any decent job I've ever seen has health insurance of varying degrees of effectiveness as part of the benefits. Much like vacation time, it seems to be a pretty standard benefit for any job that carries a decent salary.

Thanks

Date: 2009-09-30 10:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jafesq.livejournal.com
It is refreshing to see a thoughtful discussion of the public plan instead of name-calling and fear mongering. Thank you

Date: 2009-09-30 07:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com
technically, getting everyone care so they don't use the emergency rooms at everyone else's expense should lower your employer's (and my wife's employer's) cost so that they can actually pay you a higher salary. i don't believe any plan out there mandates plan or doctor changes. from what i heard, the CBO estimates that after ten years, 10 million people would be on the public option. small potatoes.

Date: 2009-09-30 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] donkeyjon.livejournal.com
While I am skeptical about the "better salary" result, I agree that getting people an option other than ER access would help with costs.

Date: 2009-09-30 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com
correction: so they can either pay you more or hire more people or buy another house for the third thursday in september.

Date: 2009-09-30 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com
?? My employer's coverage costs me plenty. If they didn't have to cover me they could afford to pay me more. (Barring y'know, them being assholes, which is never a given.) And most of us with employer coverage pay about a third of the total premium deducted from our paycheck anyway, so, really really not "no personal cost."

Date: 2009-10-01 02:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] donkeyjon.livejournal.com
I've had plans that did either. My current plan costs me nothing (though my employer is paying SOMETHING for it). My concern, however, is that employers will find it simpler to force all of their employers to the plan, meaning that every American is now on one plan.

Is that likely? No. Is it possible? Sure. I'm hoping they will formulate a good plan that gives those without a chance while still letting those who are paying or are subsidized by their employer to get care above and beyond the public plan.

Date: 2009-10-01 12:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
And if you lose your job and can't find another job with similar benefits? Go COBRA? Or what if you want to start your own business?

Date: 2009-10-01 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] donkeyjon.livejournal.com
The lost job scenario is exactly what COBRA was created for. But yes, I recognize that there are holes in the system. Like I said, I'd MUCH prefer we did a complete overhaul of the insurance system, but the lawmakers don't seem keen on that. :)

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 03:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios