Some terminally ill patients in Oregon who turned to their state for health care were denied treatment and offered doctor-assisted suicide instead, a proposal some experts have called a "chilling" corruption of medical ethics.
Since the spread of his prostate cancer, 53-year-old Randy Stroup of Dexter, Ore., has been in a fight for his life. Uninsured and unable to pay for expensive chemotherapy, he applied to Oregon's state-run health plan for help.
Lane Individual Practice Association (LIPA), which administers the Oregon Health Plan in Lane County, responded to Stroup's request with a letter saying the state would not cover Stroup's pricey treatment, but would pay for the cost of physician-assisted suicide.
Yes, because Fox "News" is known for it's honestly and truthfulness.
How many people in our country now get NO CARE AT ALL because they have no insurance???
Since all these right-wingers seem confused, OBAMA ISN'T EVEN ADVOCATING SOCIALIZED HEALTH CARE. That is a myth of the right wing. All he's advocating is a public option for those who have no health insurance.
It would be nice if right wingers would bother to actually check FACTS instead of making things up.
That is NOT a corruption of medical ethics - since physician assisted suicide was voted BY THE PUBLIC to be allowed in Oregon.
The DOCTOR does not control what insurance will cover - without insurance he can't submit the patient for chemotherapy, which means they have NO CHANCE for survival in the doctor's opinion.
The doctor offered the only other alternative available in THAT situation.
The problem is the LACK OF COVERAGE of those patients. The doctor's originally SUGGESTED CHEMO -- which is why it was submitted to insurance to be turned down IN THE FIRST PLACE.
The doctor has to consider that IF he cannot administer a procedure to save his patients life, that he can at least OFFER an alternative that MINIMIZES SUFFERING. THAT is within the realm of medical ethics...
Your complaint should be with the insurance company --- which means you should use this as an example to AGREE WITH OBAMA's PUBLIC OPTION.
Oh....there you go wanting those "context" and "fact" things again!!
*sigh*
Don't you just get TIRED of asking for such little quibblings? It's much easier to just go with the "soundbyte politics" and not fire up the neurons like the rest of the conservatives/GOP does.
What's funny about these Cartoons is that you could literally swap Obama with an insurance guy and it would be applicable to the problems of today, but be as equally true.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 02:28 pm (UTC)He just said he would make sure people weren't doing meaningless tests that didn't add value to the diagnosis to increase survival.
He ALSO said he would focus on waste that doesnt help ANYBODY get better.
Did you watch this video before you posted it? It contradicts the cartoon you posted and AGREES with atreides74 response...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 02:01 pm (UTC)How many people in our country now get NO CARE AT ALL because they have no insurance???
Since all these right-wingers seem confused, OBAMA ISN'T EVEN ADVOCATING SOCIALIZED HEALTH CARE. That is a myth of the right wing. All he's advocating is a public option for those who have no health insurance.
It would be nice if right wingers would bother to actually check FACTS instead of making things up.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Re: Walking away.
From:Sorry, couldn't help but make the joke.
From:Re: Sorry, couldn't help but make the joke.
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:This shit just writes itself.
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:Re: Well yeah, 12 to 20 million illegals are taken care of on the back of us citizens
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Just sayin'
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:So you AGREE with Obama? Good!!
Date: 2009-07-25 02:34 pm (UTC)The DOCTOR does not control what insurance will cover - without insurance he can't submit the patient for chemotherapy, which means they have NO CHANCE for survival in the doctor's opinion.
The doctor offered the only other alternative available in THAT situation.
The problem is the LACK OF COVERAGE of those patients. The doctor's originally SUGGESTED CHEMO -- which is why it was submitted to insurance to be turned down IN THE FIRST PLACE.
The doctor has to consider that IF he cannot administer a procedure to save his patients life, that he can at least OFFER an alternative that MINIMIZES SUFFERING. THAT is within the realm of medical ethics...
Your complaint should be with the insurance company --- which means you should use this as an example to AGREE WITH OBAMA's PUBLIC OPTION.
Re: So you AGREE with Obama? Good!!
From:Re: So you AGREE with Obama? Good!!
From:Re: So you AGREE with Obama? Good!!
From:Re: So you AGREE with Obama? Good!!
From:Re: So you AGREE with Obama? Good!!
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 01:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:My cats use the couch.
From:Re: My cats use the couch.
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 02:37 pm (UTC)*sigh*
Don't you just get TIRED of asking for such little quibblings? It's much easier to just go with the "soundbyte politics" and not fire up the neurons like the rest of the conservatives/GOP does.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 05:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-26 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-26 06:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-26 09:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-26 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 01:57 am (UTC)