Date: 2009-01-09 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
Ok, this is funny.

Date: 2009-01-09 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morganashkevron.livejournal.com
It is a funny cartoon, but the implication is more than a little misleading. It's not like the CIA Director dons a cape and mask and goes incognito. He pulls all the information gathered by the actual spies, analyses it, and presents the findings to the President. Which is why Panetta will most likely be an excellent director - he's smart, a very capable administrator, and Obama trusts him to tell the truth without sugar-coating or forcing an agenda.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2009-01-10 01:02 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-01-10 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fleaplus.livejournal.com
Here's some commentary from former CIA folks, some who are happy, some unhappy with the pick:

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/node/14914

Date: 2009-01-10 08:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com
Win. The only answer you'll get from ANYBODY in the CIA is "we are not in the business of disseminating information, only gathering it."

Date: 2009-01-09 08:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atreides74.livejournal.com
Gorelick did not create that wall. It was in place back in the Reagan era.

Are you done lying and misleading yet?

Date: 2009-01-09 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atreides74.livejournal.com
For the love of all that is decent, do some fucking research. That "wall" was in place for over 20 years when she wrote and submitted that memo (which, by the way, was her single contribution to said wall) and ultimately had very little effect.
To blame her for that wall is dishonest. It's like blaming a person who dumps 5 quarts of used motor oil into a lake for all of the world's pollution problems.

Date: 2009-01-12 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atreides74.livejournal.com
If that is what passes for research where you come from, any institution that granted you a graduate degree should be ashamed of themselves.
Cherry-picking one single quote to back up your "thesis" is not research.
When I said do research, I meant real research. I meant go back and look at the beginnings of the wall in the early '80s when it actually started, instead of blaming Jamie Gorelick for all of it because you find her to be a convenient (if unrealistic) scapegoat.

Date: 2009-01-09 11:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] savagemind.livejournal.com
What did the CIA think of Tenet before he came aboard? Whatever it is, it should be opposite of that.

Date: 2009-01-09 07:50 pm (UTC)
weswilson: (Default)
From: [personal profile] weswilson
There is no evidence to support the idea that someone with Panetta's experience would not be an excellent CIA director.

Date: 2009-01-09 10:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
Richard Clarke thinks Panetta will do a good job. That's enough for me to recognize he will. Panetta was very involved in working with the intelligence community when he was with the Clinton White House.

He'll be a damn sight better than George "It's a slam dunk" Tennant.

Date: 2009-01-10 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com
The guy John Spencer's character was based on in The West Wing?

No way he's that bad. Not to mention, director =/= spy. I mean, duh?

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 1st, 2026 12:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios