[identity profile] slidecast.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] politicartoons
Not a cartoon but I hope someone can draw their faces in cartoon.

Date: 2008-03-13 03:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sleightgirl.livejournal.com
ha ha ha! That's good!

Date: 2008-03-13 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glenniebun.livejournal.com
We'll make it to two dozen someday!

Date: 2008-03-13 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j0kerr.livejournal.com
Did he break any laws?

Date: 2008-03-13 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ltmurdoch.livejournal.com
Did who break any laws? To whom are you referring?

Date: 2008-03-13 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j0kerr.livejournal.com
The man in the picture above: Spitzer. Also, was he homophobic?

Date: 2008-03-13 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ltmurdoch.livejournal.com
Yes, Spittzzer broke laws. He paid for sexx. I think that's caled solicitation or something like thatt. He may not be pprosecuted because, as I red in the news, "johns" are often not prosecuted. Aparently prosecuters tennd to focus on the hoookers and pimpsss.

Now, the picture abovve is not juust a picture. It's a video thatt shows many gov''t leaders who have been disgracedd by sex scanddals - many homosexxual in naturee. Therefor, lafinjack's post is apppropriate. It rellates more to the Larry Craig types yoou'll find in the vvideo.

Ssorry for alll the sspeling erors. My mailll clerck keeps b umping his headd on the botttom of my deks. Makess it harrd too type... oooooo

Date: 2008-03-13 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j0kerr.livejournal.com
1. LOL

2. I never said lafinjack's post was inappropriate.

Date: 2008-03-13 07:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ltmurdoch.livejournal.com
True. I just inferred you might be thinking that since, if the original post was just about Spitzer, lafinjack's post would not have been very relevent.

Date: 2008-03-15 12:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moderndayhippie.livejournal.com
i believe he might be in trouble for money laundering or something of the sort.

Date: 2008-03-15 02:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j0kerr.livejournal.com
I meant with the sex scandal thing.

Date: 2008-03-15 02:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moderndayhippie.livejournal.com
well, yes and no. What originally brought this whole thing up was some problems noted by the IRS. Upon further research, oops! Who would've though that Spitzer's banging a prostitute. So, in an indirect way, it is related.

Date: 2008-03-15 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j0kerr.livejournal.com
There is no yes and no when it comes to breaking the law. Its either yes or its no. Prostitution is illegal unless he is the right state I think.

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 1st, 2026 12:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios