I am sick and tired of Cheney depicted as the Grim Reaper, Satan, and other evil characters!! When will people realize that he's not like this at all??!!
Trudeau's only following the lead of GWB himself, who actually called Cheney Darth Vader.
But of course you are right. He is positively saintly. Gandhi-like he leads his people in the practise of ahimsa, and foregoes even treading on beetles or other arthropods. The light of his soul illuminates all who surround him with grace and goodness, and where he steps, there is peace and tranquillity.
And then signing another piece of paper that gives him blanket immunity from subsequent prosecution no matter what he has done or instructed others to do. To the best of my knowledge, no American has ever been extradited to face war-crimes charges: this is probably because since the beginning of the 20th Century no American has committed them. Lord Haw-Haw (William Joyce) was Irish/Naturalised British (Ireland became a free state in 1922). We put Moseley in Gaol alongside his wife Diana Mitford. Our chaps were, at the time, more liable to fascist behaviour. But it's also true that you don't need a 'Get Out Of Jail Free' card unless you worry about where your actions will lead you, or have led you.
Obviously, after all, it's the justification for all sorts of other infringements of civil liberties, it's just we can't have the President treated the same as an ordinary person, now can we? He is, after all, anointed by god....or is that the British Monarch? Damn, these things confuse me so much.
...no American has ever been extradited to face war-crimes charges: this is probably because since the beginning of the 20th Century no American has committed them.
No no no. They've been committed, it's only that the U.S. has been on the winning side (even when the the U.S. didn't win) and the victors tend to ignore their role being played in war crimes comitals.
My point was, Americans have committed war crimes. How they were prosecuted wasn't my point. I guess we were just making different points. I was just confused b/c you said "no American has ever been extradited to face war-crimes charges: this is probably because since the beginning of the 20th Century no American has committed them."
Man, Hillary in an SS uniform seems unlikely....or even for that matter a Commissar's hat with hammer and sickle prominent. Which is probably why Bill played with the interns.
Let's put this in perspective. Just about every politician in the Republican Party is, in world political terms, the extreme right, excepting most aren't fascist. Being a Dem, Hillary is for America, almost left-wing. Which is about the same as most traditional Middle-of-the-road European Politicians. Good ol' fashioned Marxists are your actual left wing.
And I just can't picture her dressing up like that even for fun of a certain kind: it doesn't seem to fit the rest of her persona. But I'd be happy to be wrong: but probably not quite as happy as William Jefferson Clinton.
Of course, I'm theorising ahead of my data, but if you know better, please share. Gossip like that happens so rarely.
Hillary, being a Capitalist, can not possibly ever be a part of the "radical left" she is characterized as being.
She'll have the same policies as Bush, only phrased different ways, with the same geo-political outcomes.
O! Hai! What's that Senate Bill HR 1955!? (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-h20071023-31&bill=h110-1955) You want to come out and play!? Who voted for you, you little tyke? 404 Democrats! to 6 republicans and third party members? But I thoughts that Democrats were for the American people and freedom and any other bullshit marketing campaign the dems want you to think is true. And who, Mr. and Mrs. Democrats, do you suppose are dangerous terrorist groups? Code Pink (The devil is in the details) (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1912687/posts)!? But they only want to stop the war and do so peaceably. Ohh... right. Anyone ANYONE who questions you, Democrats, and you, Republicans are enemies of the state and ought to be demonized. I'm sorry to hear that. Of course you are totally right. You are always right and just. Code Pink has always been a terrorist organization. The ruling class is just and magnificient with the bribes they put on us (A new Wal-Mart store! Opening soon! Thank you capital!) to keep us pacified and ignorant. Long live the Demopubs! Long live the Republicrats! Long live the lackies of that grand old party, the Greens and most of all GOD BLESS THIS SYSTEM OF OURS.
Gordon Bennett....that's pretty Draconian, anyone would think you chaps had bombs going off regularly.
From the 70's through to the turn of the Century, Londoners had semi-regular bombings, courtesy of the Boyos and financed by Noraid (with the odd bit of Bank-Robbing and drug dealing to shore up accounts). We imprisoned a lot of the wrong folk; often, it seems, on the strength of their Irish accents. Thank god we didn't have the Death Penalty.
This sort of 'kneejerk legislation' is often utter crap, and has to be repealed in embarrassing circumstances, normally with financial compensation for those imrisoned by it, & a slap on the wrist from human rights folk, or in the US case, some constitution challenge.
I was planning a trip across the pond to visit relatives and friends....y'know what....I might just pass. America's getting way too scary. And I come from a country where we're monitored just about all the time we spend outside of our houses. I suppose one is comfortable with what one knows and understands.
Ah, but there is an implication that the 'emotive despite' is in conflict with 'the facts', which is something you may wish to clarify. Because to me they seem entirely consonant. I just wondered if and where we diverged, and of course, facts would be useful in this circumstance.
It's not a conflict, but a disinterest. The black and white version of the events is by definition ignoring the unavoidable grey-areas and skewing reality.
I personally believe his views on executive privilege are bad for the US, and this leads me to believe that he isn't right for the job. Notice at no point during the previous statement did I need to say "He's just like that bad man in that film. You didn't like him, did you?"
Jāadoube. I have often myself thought that, for example, GWB would make a damn fine Poker buddy/drinking companion. Be that as it may I cannot be 'disinterested' in things that seem so contrary to what I consider to be reasonable and responsible behaviour in government, especially in the most powerful government in the world at the moment, with which we have been the closest of allies for some considerable time. Non-normative analysis eludes me in this, alas. Also, we should be able to convey the general argument without becoming opaque through the use of technical terms, jargon, or polysyllabic exactitude; mainly in order to avoid tedious semantic explanation: but I find I am wanting in this, despite my legendary laziness. Alas again. I find I cannot but 'engage', and when that happens I hope my chums will keep me in check, or at least stop me from making too big a fool of myself. Often it appears, we suffer from the same faults: which is why I like you.
Around the same time that the far right recognizes that Bush isn't what they portray HIM to be... it sorta goes hand-in-hand with this anti-liberal polemic that has been featured so prominently on radio and tv.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 02:38 pm (UTC)But of course you are right. He is positively saintly. Gandhi-like he leads his people in the practise of ahimsa, and foregoes even treading on beetles or other arthropods.
The light of his soul illuminates all who surround him with grace and goodness, and where he steps, there is peace and tranquillity.
Obviously.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 03:47 pm (UTC)he's nowhere near that nice
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 04:09 pm (UTC)When he stops acting like a third-rate movie villain.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 04:30 pm (UTC)To the best of my knowledge, no American has ever been extradited to face war-crimes charges: this is probably because since the beginning of the 20th Century no American has committed them. Lord Haw-Haw (William Joyce) was Irish/Naturalised British (Ireland became a free state in 1922). We put Moseley in Gaol alongside his wife Diana Mitford. Our chaps were, at the time, more liable to fascist behaviour.
But it's also true that you don't need a 'Get Out Of Jail Free' card unless you worry about where your actions will lead you, or have led you.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 06:37 pm (UTC)If you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to fear and all that, right?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:02 pm (UTC)He is, after all, anointed by god....or is that the British Monarch? Damn, these things confuse me so much.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 08:34 pm (UTC)No no no. They've been committed, it's only that the U.S. has been on the winning side (even when the the U.S. didn't win) and the victors tend to ignore their role being played in war crimes comitals.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 05:35 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-08 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-08 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-08 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 04:33 pm (UTC)Which is probably why Bill played with the interns.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 04:47 pm (UTC)Just about every politician in the Republican Party is, in world political terms, the extreme right, excepting most aren't fascist. Being a Dem, Hillary is for America, almost left-wing. Which is about the same as most traditional Middle-of-the-road European Politicians. Good ol' fashioned Marxists are your actual left wing.
And I just can't picture her dressing up like that even for fun of a certain kind: it doesn't seem to fit the rest of her persona.
But I'd be happy to be wrong: but probably not quite as happy as William Jefferson Clinton.
Of course, I'm theorising ahead of my data, but if you know better, please share. Gossip like that happens so rarely.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 08:50 pm (UTC)She'll have the same policies as Bush, only phrased different ways, with the same geo-political outcomes.
O! Hai! What's that Senate Bill HR 1955!? (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-h20071023-31&bill=h110-1955) You want to come out and play!? Who voted for you, you little tyke? 404 Democrats! to 6 republicans and third party members? But I thoughts that Democrats were for the American people and freedom and any other bullshit marketing campaign the dems want you to think is true. And who, Mr. and Mrs. Democrats, do you suppose are dangerous terrorist groups? Code Pink (The devil is in the details) (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1912687/posts)!? But they only want to stop the war and do so peaceably. Ohh... right. Anyone ANYONE who questions you, Democrats, and you, Republicans are enemies of the state and ought to be demonized. I'm sorry to hear that. Of course you are totally right. You are always right and just. Code Pink has always been a terrorist organization. The ruling class is just and magnificient with the bribes they put on us (A new Wal-Mart store! Opening soon! Thank you capital!) to keep us pacified and ignorant. Long live the Demopubs! Long live the Republicrats! Long live the lackies of that grand old party, the Greens and most of all GOD BLESS THIS SYSTEM OF OURS.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 11:18 pm (UTC)From the 70's through to the turn of the Century, Londoners had semi-regular bombings, courtesy of the Boyos and financed by Noraid (with the odd bit of Bank-Robbing and drug dealing to shore up accounts). We imprisoned a lot of the wrong folk; often, it seems, on the strength of their Irish accents. Thank god we didn't have the Death Penalty.
This sort of 'kneejerk legislation' is often utter crap, and has to be repealed in embarrassing circumstances, normally with financial compensation for those imrisoned by it, & a slap on the wrist from human rights folk, or in the US case, some constitution challenge.
I was planning a trip across the pond to visit relatives and friends....y'know what....I might just pass. America's getting way too scary. And I come from a country where we're monitored just about all the time we spend outside of our houses. I suppose one is comfortable with what one knows and understands.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:37 pm (UTC)I personally believe his views on executive privilege are bad for the US, and this leads me to believe that he isn't right for the job. Notice at no point during the previous statement did I need to say "He's just like that bad man in that film. You didn't like him, did you?"
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:24 pm (UTC)I have often myself thought that, for example, GWB would make a damn fine Poker buddy/drinking companion.
Be that as it may I cannot be 'disinterested' in things that seem so contrary to what I consider to be reasonable and responsible behaviour in government, especially in the most powerful government in the world at the moment, with which we have been the closest of allies for some considerable time.
Non-normative analysis eludes me in this, alas.
Also, we should be able to convey the general argument without becoming opaque through the use of technical terms, jargon, or polysyllabic exactitude; mainly in order to avoid tedious semantic explanation: but I find I am wanting in this, despite my legendary laziness. Alas again.
I find I cannot but 'engage', and when that happens I hope my chums will keep me in check, or at least stop me from making too big a fool of myself.
Often it appears, we suffer from the same faults: which is why I like you.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 07:25 am (UTC)