Also, I'm curious if people think Petraeus is liar by saying the following: "At the outset I would like to note that this is my testimony. Although I have briefed my assessment and recommendations to my chain of command, I wrote this testimony myself. It has not been cleared by nor shared with anyone in the Pentagon, the White House or the Congress until it was just handed out."
I doubt that Petraeus is lying. People don't need to lie to editorialise.
The most we can ask for from any report is accurate data, honestly analysed. (Unlike the reports we [the UK] got about the war, the BBC, and WMD.) How far Petraeus's report strays from this ideal only hindsight will show.
Now I'm imagining them re-creating the scene where the world of imagination has been reduced to a single grain of sand.
George Bush: "What do I wish for?" Dick Cheney: "Anything you want." George Bush: "I don't know what to wish for." Dick Cheney: "Then there will be no success in Iraq."
[cuts to scene of George Bush riding Falkor, swooping down and scaring all of those who mocked him and disagreed with him]
show how you can editorialise to such an extent that the conclusions drawn will always be those wanted by your political masters. And the folk in the UK are a lot more cynical and probably more wordly-wise than many other peoples.
Hindsight's told us what both these reports/reviews were worth. Just as hindsight has told us a lot about the war, the subsequent debacle, and our present gift of victory to our populations, and peace and prosperity to the Iraqis. I just don't get why they're not more grateful.
I am coming to the conclusion that prison is the right place for the folk that put us in this situation. And of those, Saddam was but a minor cog, and obvious target. It's the folk closer to home I'm more concerned with.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 10:12 am (UTC)The most we can ask for from any report is accurate data, honestly analysed. (Unlike the reports we [the UK] got about the war, the BBC, and WMD.)
How far Petraeus's report strays from this ideal only hindsight will show.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:41 pm (UTC)George Bush: "What do I wish for?"
Dick Cheney: "Anything you want."
George Bush: "I don't know what to wish for."
Dick Cheney: "Then there will be no success in Iraq."
[cuts to scene of George Bush riding Falkor, swooping down and scaring all of those who mocked him and disagreed with him]
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 04:30 pm (UTC)for somereson beter-us made me think of atraie. that vision is too funny. >_
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 05:39 am (UTC)Sure, but the comic's assertion is that Petraeus is a sock puppet for Bush.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 07:41 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butler_Review
and the Hutton Inquiry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutton_Inquiry
show how you can editorialise to such an extent that the conclusions drawn will always be those wanted by your political masters. And the folk in the UK are a lot more cynical and probably more wordly-wise than many other peoples.
Hindsight's told us what both these reports/reviews were worth. Just as hindsight has told us a lot about the war, the subsequent debacle, and our present gift of victory to our populations, and peace and prosperity to the Iraqis.
I just don't get why they're not more grateful.
I am coming to the conclusion that prison is the right place for the folk that put us in this situation. And of those, Saddam was but a minor cog, and obvious target. It's the folk closer to home I'm more concerned with.