right because there is so much evidence to suggest that evangelicals are planning to blow up abortion clinics nationwide. Cuz we all know its sanctioned in the bible to kill pro-choicers, unlike, of course, the religion of peace, which strictly forbids killing anyone who isn't a muslim. (http://www.ethicalatheist.com/docs/islam_infidels.html)
Or one of Christian doctors refusing medical treatment (http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0408/p01s02-ussc.html)..Or of Jewish Israelis hatin gays (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6463414)...
Fer (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/10/24.html#a5531) realz (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/08/28/rape-victims-mom-tells-the-story-of-her-daughter-being-refused-the-plan-b-pill-by-a-doctor/)
Plus, I think it would've been a lot better if they included some of the things the imams did on the plane, like the thing with the seat belt extensions, and distributing themselves in critical locations around the plane instead of sitting in their assigned seats.
"Shahin denied allegation of suspicious behavior[22] and said everyone in the group had round-trip tickets and that he has the documentation to prove it, that he asked for a seatbelt extension because he weighs 290 pounds, and that the group conducted their sunset-time prayers in a quiet manner.
The police report shows the Imams sitting in seats 1B, 9C, 9D, 21B, 25D and 25E.[23] Regarding the claim that the Imams did not sit in their assigned seats, Omar Shahin stated that only one Imam, Sadeddin, switched seats. Marwan Sadeddin, who is blind and claimed to need assistance, convinced a coach passenger to exchange seats so that he could sit next to Mahmoud Sulaiman[24] on Row 9. Explaining his seats in first class, Omar Shahin said that he is a frequent flyer and had received an Elite Member upgrade to first class. [24]
[b]US Airways has not published the seat assignments of the Imams, so their actual seat assignments are unknown.[/b]"
I love how conservatives in America will sanction one religion and condemn another when essentially they are the same. It's just that one religion's ambitions are a little more subtle.
Religion really is bunk. Having said that, let the Muslims pray in the airports. Unless you want to ban all religious expression, which would be fair.
"Unless you want to ban all religious expression, which would be fair."
How would that be fair? Please don't go French on me and claim that the secularist ideal justifies taking away people's dignity and right to follow their religion when it is not infringing on other people's rights e.g. hijab, prayers... etc...
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 08:15 pm (UTC)O HAY GUYS LOL MUSLIMS WUT.
I don't normally agree with Cox and Forkum, and it looks like that trend is emphatically being upheld.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 01:32 am (UTC)RUN TO THE HILLS!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 02:49 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Imams_controversy
no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 09:20 am (UTC)"Shahin denied allegation of suspicious behavior[22] and said everyone in the group had round-trip tickets and that he has the documentation to prove it, that he asked for a seatbelt extension because he weighs 290 pounds, and that the group conducted their sunset-time prayers in a quiet manner.
The police report shows the Imams sitting in seats 1B, 9C, 9D, 21B, 25D and 25E.[23] Regarding the claim that the Imams did not sit in their assigned seats, Omar Shahin stated that only one Imam, Sadeddin, switched seats. Marwan Sadeddin, who is blind and claimed to need assistance, convinced a coach passenger to exchange seats so that he could sit next to Mahmoud Sulaiman[24] on Row 9. Explaining his seats in first class, Omar Shahin said that he is a frequent flyer and had received an Elite Member upgrade to first class. [24]
[b]US Airways has not published the seat assignments of the Imams, so their actual seat assignments are unknown.[/b]"
no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 03:53 am (UTC)Religion really is bunk. Having said that, let the Muslims pray in the airports. Unless you want to ban all religious expression, which would be fair.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 04:23 am (UTC)How would that be fair? Please don't go French on me and claim that the secularist ideal justifies taking away people's dignity and right to follow their religion when it is not infringing on other people's rights e.g. hijab, prayers... etc...