Reverse racism and reverse sexism are stupid terms. It's not a one way street. Usually when you have a moral theory that isolates one group as capable of being racist, for example, but another group cannot be, then you have a bad moral theory. And, that's what we see being thrown around today. The reality is everyone is behaving ethnocentrically, but only one group is being vilified for it. And it deserves to be mocked for the absurdity that it is.
As far as your questions go, there has to be an ethnocentric state for white people somewhere. One that doesn't subvert the host population in favor of foreigners with anti-white policies. Otherwise you end up with a form of genocide.
I don't see why foreigners couldn't be granted various worker visas. But, they would have to go back to their own ethnocentric nation with the skills they've learned.
And, I have no idea what you're referencing, but women have plenty of reproductive rights. Women tend to be happier when they're participating in making a family. And it's absurd to think that's a lower position when it's an essential element to a thriving community of people.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2017-02-09 10:32 pm (UTC)As far as your questions go, there has to be an ethnocentric state for white people somewhere. One that doesn't subvert the host population in favor of foreigners with anti-white policies. Otherwise you end up with a form of genocide.
I don't see why foreigners couldn't be granted various worker visas. But, they would have to go back to their own ethnocentric nation with the skills they've learned.
And, I have no idea what you're referencing, but women have plenty of reproductive rights. Women tend to be happier when they're participating in making a family. And it's absurd to think that's a lower position when it's an essential element to a thriving community of people.