I didn't mean it to be funny. I was just showing how opposite the two sides are: the first a leftist cartoon, the second, a conservative cartoon showing ignorance from the tea baggers and trump supporters who claim Hillary denied support to the soldiers, CIA officials, and the state dept. officials in Benghazi during the 9-11 terrorist attack. Personally, I think the secretary of defence refused to allow anyone nearby to help those poor people. Hillary's job had nothing to do with a military base.
Also, I think the secretary of defence refused to allow anyone nearby to help those poor people. You think incorrectly. You believe a blatant lie. NEXT?
This cartoon seems to be depicting the issue of Benghazi as dead and buried, which it is, or should be. In case you're not clear on why that is, op, I suggest you educate yourself:
A comprehensive guide to myths and facts about Hillary Clinton, Benghazi, and those emails (http://mediamatters.org/research/00/10/21/a-comprehensive-guide-to-myths-and-facts-about/206289)
I was educated at the University of Alabama, the University of Pennsylvania, the Jones School of Law, and the Alabama State University. I was showing two political cartoons from two totally different perspectives on Hillary's involvement in Benhazi: the left and the right. You were not educated by the duplicitous sides of the Benghazi coin the dems and repubs flip in the US house? If you could not clearly see what I was doing, educate yourself. You seem pretty harsh on me for being fair, balanced, and objective. I displayed BOTH sides' views. You seemed to understand what the first one meant: dead and buried, the issue of Hillary's involvement in Benghazi. You did not understand what the second one meant to the rediculous right?
For someone who claims four degrees, you have an abysmal grasp of spelling, grammar, and punctuation. As well, you use a number of words in ways where, well, those words don't fit. But your larger meaning is generally graspable, even if we have to substitute appropriate words where you're using inappropriate ones incorrectly.
Is this part of your "message"? Are you attempting to suggest that people from Alabama can't communicate in English, or are you just suggesting that the Alabama HoR member you're falsely claiming to be is stupid?
Speaking of which: Alvin Holmes, whose name and picture this Livejournal user has appropriated, is a State Representative in Alabama's 78th district. He's 76 years old and it's extraordinarily unlikely he's a semiliterate Benghazi Twoofer who created a livejournal account two days ago for the sole purpose of semiliterately posting Benghazi Twoofer nonsense to this community.
ping weswilson, we have a clear fraud here. I don't think there's a formal rule against impersonating a state legislator, and his posts have, in fact, involved political cartoons, but just FYI you probably want to keep an eye on this one.
Tbqh, I missed the second one because I was reading on rhe LJ app on my phone. It only displays the beginning of each post and you have to tap to see the rest. When there are multiple cartoons, the first one displays and there's no way to tell there are more unless you tap. I only figured this out recently, and I have to keep reminding myself to always tap in case there's more.
In this case, seeing both cartoons without any explanation was confusing. Posting cartoons that show different perspectives can be quite instructive, but a word of explanation would be in order so that its clear what you're getting at.
no subject
Date: 2016-08-11 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-11 11:07 pm (UTC)First one? Not so funny. Silly, even.
no subject
Date: 2016-08-12 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-13 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-14 03:50 am (UTC)Also,
I think the secretary of defence refused to allow anyone nearby to help those poor people.
You think incorrectly. You believe a blatant lie. NEXT?
no subject
Date: 2016-08-12 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-11 06:54 pm (UTC)This cartoon seems to be depicting the issue of Benghazi as dead and buried, which it is, or should be. In case you're not clear on why that is, op, I suggest you educate yourself:
A comprehensive guide to myths and facts about Hillary Clinton, Benghazi, and those emails (http://mediamatters.org/research/00/10/21/a-comprehensive-guide-to-myths-and-facts-about/206289)
no subject
Date: 2016-08-12 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-14 04:04 am (UTC)Is this part of your "message"? Are you attempting to suggest that people from Alabama can't communicate in English, or are you just suggesting that the Alabama HoR member you're falsely claiming to be is stupid?
Speaking of which: Alvin Holmes, whose name and picture this Livejournal user has appropriated, is a State Representative in Alabama's 78th district. He's 76 years old and it's extraordinarily unlikely he's a semiliterate Benghazi Twoofer who created a livejournal account two days ago for the sole purpose of semiliterately posting Benghazi Twoofer nonsense to this community.
ping
no subject
Date: 2016-08-14 08:35 am (UTC)Tbqh, I missed the second one because I was reading on rhe LJ app on my phone. It only displays the beginning of each post and you have to tap to see the rest. When there are multiple cartoons, the first one displays and there's no way to tell there are more unless you tap. I only figured this out recently, and I have to keep reminding myself to always tap in case there's more.
In this case, seeing both cartoons without any explanation was confusing. Posting cartoons that show different perspectives can be quite instructive, but a word of explanation would be in order so that its clear what you're getting at.