Maybe. I am not that clever sometimes. But I am afraid you are talking past me.
> Look.
One of the most patronizing phrases in the English language.
> So, yes. "Trying to be welcoming and inclusive for all people, or at least not offensive to their face" was called "manners" in other times, but today gets called "PC" by people who cry out that things were better in their grandparents time.
Except what was considered " welcoming and inclusive for all people" has changed. There is plenty of non-PC stuff that was considered OK by (white/straight/cis/etcetc) people at the time. I think our standards are higher now. I think we might be in agreement on that?
> Also, a "SJW" is an individual. "PC" is a social construct. You are completely off on that one too.
Nope. The terms are used (and criticized by the "PC/SJW" side) in the exact same way.
IDK, I don't really want to argue. If you are just talking past me (and I you) I don't want to do that either.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-05 04:51 pm (UTC)Maybe. I am not that clever sometimes. But I am afraid you are talking past me.
> Look.
One of the most patronizing phrases in the English language.
> So, yes. "Trying to be welcoming and inclusive for all people, or at least not offensive to their face" was called "manners" in other times, but today gets called "PC" by people who cry out that things were better in their grandparents time.
Except what was considered " welcoming and inclusive for all people" has changed. There is plenty of non-PC stuff that was considered OK by (white/straight/cis/etcetc) people at the time. I think our standards are higher now. I think we might be in agreement on that?
> Also, a "SJW" is an individual. "PC" is a social construct. You are completely off on that one too.
Nope. The terms are used (and criticized by the "PC/SJW" side) in the exact same way.
IDK, I don't really want to argue. If you are just talking past me (and I you) I don't want to do that either.
Bye.