Not all of those sources are so-called "liberal media" but suit yourself.
You don't understand - anything source that deviates from the Faux News orthodoxy is "liberal media" and therefore not to be trusted. How else are you going to keep the cultists inside the bubble?
The other side of this coin is that I can't see any reason why I should look at a heavily biased book about the Clintons that has already been thoroughly debunked.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2015-11-10 03:46 pm (UTC)You don't understand - anything source that deviates from the Faux News orthodoxy is "liberal media" and therefore not to be trusted. How else are you going to keep the cultists inside the bubble?
The other side of this coin is that I can't see any reason why I should look at a heavily biased book about the Clintons that has already been thoroughly debunked.
Not to mention one where the publisher had to make "significant revisions" two weeks after publication to correct factual errors in reporting:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/clinton-cash-publisher-corrects-errors-in-book/
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/15/politics/clinton-cash-book-revisions/
The house of cards fell almost as soon as it was propped up.