I wasn't implying they wouldn't. I was implying that without that Federal aid, Texas would go from having some great roads and infrastructure, 'could be worse' schools, good hospitals, reliable emergency services, to those of a Third World nation.
I mean no offense, but yes things would degrade a bit I think.
I understand what you mean. We all want the best things possible, whatever those things may be, but if you virtually exist because of benefits given to you but essentially bite the hand that feeds you or can't play nicely with others, then perhaps those benefits need to be taken away. Why should they be rewarded for bad behaviour?
*tries to imagine several states without environmental regulation dumping raw sewage into rivers going into other states* *imagines Mississippi reinstating slavery. Because: Mississippi*
I keep telling the joke: Why doesn't the US allow the South to secede? Because we Mexico doesn't want a dirty, polluted, poverty-struck, crime-ridden, uneducated, theocratic, third-world country on their border.
Well, when you consider the social welfare of Mexico I can understand not wanting that to happen. The Southerners would run wild and think it was within their right.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-16 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 01:19 am (UTC)I think what would happen is in about 30 years Texas would be a Third World country.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-19 12:40 am (UTC)I mean no offense, but yes things would degrade a bit I think.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-19 12:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 02:58 pm (UTC)*imagines Mississippi reinstating slavery. Because: Mississippi*
I keep telling the joke: Why doesn't the US allow the South to secede?
Because
weMexico doesn't want a dirty, polluted, poverty-struck, crime-ridden, uneducated, theocratic, third-world country on their border.no subject
Date: 2015-07-18 03:15 pm (UTC)The Southerners would run wild and think it was within their right.