(no subject)

[madscience.livejournal.com]

Snowden/Manning 2016!

Comments

[madscience.livejournal.com]

It was going on long before 2007. And its legality remains dubious.

[i.livejournal.com]

"common knowledge since 2006" And the legality is not dubious at all. The morality maybe, but not the legality.

and to your OP, I wouldn't trust either one of them with running this country.

[madscience.livejournal.com]

It was common knowledge at least as far back as 2000. Of course, then it was dismissed as a crackpot conspiracy theory by the same people who are now dismissing it because it was common knowledge.

And no, the legality is still very much in question. Even if you accept the legitimacy of the laws that were written after the fact to legalize what the NSA had been doing for years... we're now learning that they're not even complying with those laws.

I would literally kill to have Snowden or Manning running this country.

[i.livejournal.com]

I'm guessing you don't vote. Am I right?

[madscience.livejournal.com]

Wrong as usual.

[i.livejournal.com]

It was a guess, honeychunks. I do think it's a shame that you pollute the voting pool, though.

[madscience.livejournal.com]

Of course it was a guess. Everything you believe is a guess. And "honeychunks?" What kind of satisfaction does a middle-aged man get from a faux African-American grandma affect when talking to another middle-aged man? Is that some kind of gay thing?

I think it's a shame that you're breathing, so there's that.

[i.livejournal.com]

Whatever gets you hard. It'd really cute that you managed to insert two stereotypes into your lame attempt at a riposte. You wouldn't know a Black grandma if she kicked your ass down the street, and gay? Please, get off the playground.

[madscience.livejournal.com]

Hey, I'm not the one trying to sound tough by talking like Lady Chablis.