Date: 2014-06-03 10:32 pm (UTC)
The WSJ journal review (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303825604579515452952131592) isn't that far from some of the Amazon reviews.


Reviewer Daniel Shuchman describes this painstakingly careful work as “less a work of economic analysis than a bizarre ideological screed.” He also suggests that Piketty’s argument that confiscatory tax rates won’t hurt growth is a groundless “breezy” assurance. In fact, Piketty’s argument is based on his rigorous econometric analysis of fifty years of data from eighteen OECD countries. Shuchman ends his review with a classic move straight out of the red-baiting playbook: “the professor ought to read ‘Animal Farm’ and ‘Darkness at Noon,’” he wrote. Awesome point!


Source: What Piketty’s Conservative Critics Get Wrong (http://thebaffler.com/blog/2014/04/what_pikettys_conservative_critics_get_wrong)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 07:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios