(no subject)
Apr. 18th, 2014 08:33 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

It is beyond imagination that anyone could misconstrue the Soviet agitprop in Jay Carney's kitchen as an indication that White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and his wife somehow share the same ideas as the perpetrators of a brutal regime that starved its own citizens while the political elites lived in luxury, abused power, prosecuted the opposition, and ruled the country by means of executive orders.
Next, they would claim that that a neat stack of Chairman Mao's Little Red Books in Valery Jarrett's bathroom is not there merely to serve as an elegant accent to complement the shower curtains; or that the Black Panther Party insignia on Michelle Obama's pajamas isn't merely a bold decorative pattern; or that the black flag of holy Jihad in Huma Abedin's bedroom is somehow indicative of her sympathies towards the Muslim Brotherhood.
Following such flawed right-wing logic, one might even speculate that Saul Alinsky's books on Hillary Clinton's living room mean anything other than an effort to disguise an obscure dried spot that had mysteriously appeared on the coffee table in the last year of her husband's presidency.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-20 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 03:09 am (UTC)I ask you this - would you consider KKK posters as an art? Please yes or no.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 03:20 am (UTC)Did the KKK posters you're thinking of have art on them? Then yes.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 06:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 11:37 pm (UTC)Oxford, just in case you would think that I came up with the definition.
Tell me where do you see any beauty here.
Actually, you are right, me and a lot of other people, like millions, do not like it not only because it's a piece of junk, but also for what it represents. So, if you like it, then not only you are totally tasteless, but also you might be glorifying something really bad.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 01:37 am (UTC)Who said I did? I just find it odd that you're the arbiter of what is and isn't art.
So, if you like it, then not only you are totally tasteless, but also you might be glorifying something really bad.
What if you just like the visual style?
no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 03:13 am (UTC)Why?
no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 11:57 pm (UTC)Just because it's art, doesn't mean you have to like or approve of it.
no subject
Date: 2014-04-21 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-04-22 12:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: