Quasi-Kantianism

Date: 2013-03-02 07:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
The problem is that rational, autonomous agents don't have value; they are beyond value. They are worthy of respect. In order to respect your own agency, you have to do it qua agency, otherwise, you are merely valuing yourself above all other things, since respect is not value; therefore, in order to respect yourself, you have to respect all rational, autonomous agents-qua-agency. Consequently, ethics is universal-for-agents, since ethics logically follows from self-respect; the logic of self-respect is non-standard, being, at least: modal, paraconsistent, and intuititionistic. Conflicting duties doesn't imply universal permissiveness; it only implies that one ought to do whichever action has the best probable consequences. When an intuitionistic indeterminancy is proven, one is permitted to do as one pleases. So, my ethical theory includes rights, duties, consequences, and preferences.

Date: 2013-03-02 04:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Papyrus font is the root of all that's wrong with the world.

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 09:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios