Date: 2012-08-06 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
What the con-man and the lib-man are wrong about this is that as the con-man doesn't get that no he doesn't live on an island with no society to help him (besides, a missing piece of this is that the guy paid into the system(s) that he is using; the government didn't give them to him for free), it doesn't mean that the government can take credit for what he does.

It would be a university taking credit for every student that graduates, because they have the infrastructure to facilitate the student to study and pass the classes. It still took the student doing the work to make it happen.

Date: 2012-08-06 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
it doesn't mean that the government can take credit for what he does.

I think that's the big misunderstanding here. Government isn't taking credit. It's merely being pointed out that government and business have a symbiotic relationship, which is a counterpoint to the notion that a man is an island, so to speak.

Date: 2012-08-06 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
If I say to you: "you didn't build that (that being anything from a business to a model car)," because there was a system in place to facilitate it being built, then who did? The implication is that since you didn't build it, then the government has the right to more of your rewards/profits/assets whatever because you are in essence stealing from the government the "fair" output of your results because you aren't sharing enough of them with the rest of us.
Edited Date: 2012-08-06 08:37 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-08-06 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
His words, in context, referred to infrastructure, not businesses. From the speech:
If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business -- you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.
The entire paragraph provides ample context. The sentence in question contains an mdash, showing he was starting one thought, then briefly paused and switched to another thought. It's no wonder politicians use teleprompters these days. Everything they say is parsed, so any free-form speaking with broken sentences, like this one, are ripped to shreds. It amazes me how people can read this and not see the actual meaning, though.

Date: 2012-08-06 11:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Everyone who pays taxes invests in those projects and reaps the rewards of said projects, even those who don't pay into them, but not everyone who pays taxes creates their own business or builds some new device.

And who is the somebody? The somebody would be taxpayers. The government isn't able to shower down fancy roads and infrastructure out of wishes, sunshine and farts. It takes money.

Date: 2012-08-06 11:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
Again, not sure anyone is saying otherwise. The government fills in the gaps where the free market cannot. Mr. Gaster pays taxes, sure, but his tax contribution doesn't begin to make a dent in the infrastructure he benefits from. It requires our collective contribution in order to work.

I think you're still fixated on what the right wants Obama's words to mean versus what they actually meant.

Date: 2012-08-07 03:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kip-w.livejournal.com
Did the factory owner lay the bricks? Did he make the bricks, or dig the clay for them? Did he pour the cement for the foundation?

What does he think "build" means?

Date: 2012-08-07 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Without the people working inside the building making or creating something, the building itself is just a collection of mason, concrete and bricks.

What's your definition of "build"?

Date: 2012-08-07 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kip-w.livejournal.com
To make, to construct. I do know that there's a sense where one builds one's business, but of course that wasn't what I was getting at.

Oooh oooh oooh and if there's no gravity, then everybody spins off into space! I love these hypotheticals!

Date: 2012-08-07 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
That's nice.

Date: 2012-08-07 12:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
"that" is the "system in place"

I know it vital to your confirmation bias that he said "that" as "what you built", but its clear from the quote and the dangling phrase "roads and bridges" that he did not mean "a business"

Stop that obtusity.

Date: 2012-08-07 02:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Ok, well you didn't build those roads or bridges either, because I didn't see you with a hard hat on leaning on a shovel with five of your friends watching one guy do work.

Date: 2012-08-07 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Nice job if you can get it. The government pays well and tolerates it!

Date: 2012-08-09 01:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
Neither you nor I are road contractors. Nor water engineers, etc. etc.

What's your point?

Date: 2012-08-06 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
It is true about the symbiotic relationship, but when (or at what degree) does it go from symbiotic to parasitic?

Date: 2012-08-06 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
I suppose that's a subjective question. Everyone has a different idea of how little or how much the government should do, and that determines (or should, anyways) how much taxes they should collect.

Date: 2012-08-07 04:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foolsguinea.livejournal.com
Who are the parasites? Is it the civil servants who are discouraged from politicking, or the billionaires who blatantly bankroll candidates to gain special treament, or the candidates that prostitute themselves to those donors?

Date: 2012-08-07 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tigron-x.livejournal.com
A symbiotic relationship implies a voluntary relationship. I don't find the government/citizen relationship voluntary. So, I would say it's all parasitic.

Date: 2012-08-07 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
i suggest you move to antartica

Date: 2012-08-07 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com
and, no, it does not imply that at all.

you are inferring a meaning that does not exist.

Date: 2012-08-09 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
No. A symbiotic relationship is often involuntary and routine.

I think I understand whence your perpetual misunderstanding of reality derives: you mix up connotative and denotative definitions routinely and intone them like they are the voice of God.

Therefore, you are a Dunning-Kruger case study.

Date: 2012-08-09 02:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tigron-x.livejournal.com
Hey, dumb-dumb... moral theories are limited to human discourse. Quit introducing biology to it like you know what you're talking about. And look up metaphor while you're at it.

Date: 2012-08-06 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
I don't think anyone's saying that, I think they're saying though, what he has done wouldn't be possible without all the things we pay for as a society.

Date: 2012-08-06 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Then both sides are just talking past each other, looking to preach to their own choirs.

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 07:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios