Derp!!!

[blueduck37.livejournal.com]

I am LOVING this scandal because of how it's exposing how many on the right view women.

Comments

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

Do you really, honestly think he represents the majority? Note what I said: "a guy on the radio is somehow representative."

[yes-justice.livejournal.com]

Nearly every major republican and conservative figure appears on Rush's show.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

But that doesn't answer the question.

[yes-justice.livejournal.com]

Rush represents the majority of powerful conservatives, yes. That's why they appear on his show. Wanna list?

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

Interesting that you believe that. Why?

[yes-justice.livejournal.com]

I've listened to him since the 1990's and been following his career.

Keynote at CPAC. Michael Steele being told to apologize.
Check out the list of notable guests here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rush_Limbaugh_Show).

Presidents don't go on Michael Savage's show.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

Ever think it's because he reaches millions that they go on there, not because he somehow represents conservative thought?

[yes-justice.livejournal.com]

Lets review. The biggest most powerful established leaders in the conservative arena regularly appear on Rush's show to impart their ideas to millions.

In this way, "The Rush Limbaugh Show" represents conservative thought.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

That doesn't make sense, sorry.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

Ratings don't tell us a thing about who he speaks for.

[yes-justice.livejournal.com]

No worries.

A show where all the most powerful conservative leaders regular appear to get their conservative message out to millions of conservatives DOES NOT represent conservative thought. That makes total sense.

What do you think represents conservative thought, if not The Rush Limbaugh show?

[spaz-own-joo.livejournal.com]

You persist with this idea that different conservatives ought to be able to freely pool resources, use each other's media platforms, work collaboratively in the propaganda war, but remain strictly independent and separate when it comes to calling out unacceptable rhetoric. It's as if you think you can huddle together with pigs for warmth, then walk away without any mud on you.


Where was this attitude back when everyone was talking about Obama's preacher friend?

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

Do you honestly really think that it's just him saying these things at this point? Do you honestly want me to believe that it's just one person being a vile human being?

Again, do you believe he's representative? This is a yes or no question. If it's yes, please, by all means, demonstrate how.

All I and do is just roll my eyes at you. This entire debate from you is ridiculous.

Well, exert some effort and maybe we'll get somewhere.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

Yes someone is a representative when people are name dropping said person and going off of what said person said.

So how many people do you think he represents. You don't even have to prove anything (not that you can), just give us a percentage.

Why waste energy on someone who isn't going to be honest in a debate?

Well, I keep responding to you...

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

Yes, he's now became a topic. The distraction is working well. Can you answer the question or not?

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

No speaking ill of Neil.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

After you, madam.