(no subject)

[root-fu.livejournal.com]

GLOBAL WARMING

Comments

[pacotelic.livejournal.com]

um, the one on the right.

[lafinjack.livejournal.com]

Something similar was posted recently.

And aren't you a Truther? Seems odd if you're not agreeing with the left side.

[michael barnett (from livejournal.com)]

Hahaha, yeah there's no money in promoting global warming: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-the-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/

[pacotelic.livejournal.com]

A market is "promoting"?

[michael barnett (from livejournal.com)]

I was going to reply to this clear obfuscation on your part by listing the myriad of direct government subsidies to green products like cars and lightbulbs and green companies, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars, and then point out that people are getting rich off the global warming hoax, but what's the point?

No one is getting wealthy promoting global warming. I quit.

[pacotelic.livejournal.com]

How does that stack up to the government subsidy of petrochemicals and their consumption?

Hundreds of billions. Wow. I'm impressed. Got cite?

[enders-shadow.livejournal.com]

If global warming was real, do you think people would have found a way to profit off it or not?

Just cause someone is profiting from something doesn't make it nefarious.

[pacotelic.livejournal.com]

No no no, Al Gore Made Global Warming happen so he could profit off it.

That's the randroid-libertarian logic of ikilled007

[michael barnett (from livejournal.com)]

http://www.eli.org/Program_Areas/innovation_governance_energy.cfm

[farchivist.livejournal.com]

Well, considering you're a Truther and whatnot, I'm guessing you plump for the "Environmental groups seeking to hoax the world and crash the global economy." theory.