Date: 2011-11-04 02:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
Sure. I wss just making the point that the Bush and Obama stimulus/tax cut policies are not so dissimilar. Both get us deeper into debt, with debatable benefits to the economy.

Of course, Obama is sunsetting wars, while Bush started them. Which is another reason to vote for him in 2012.

Date: 2011-11-04 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Sure. I wss just making the point that the Bush and Obama stimulus/tax cut policies are not so dissimilar. Both get us deeper into debt, with debatable benefits to the economy.

Bush at least made it a point to significantly cut taxes. Obama didn't sign a tax cut until nearly 2 years into his term.

Of course, Obama is sunsetting wars, while Bush started them. Which is another reason to vote for him in 2012.

Surely, we should applaud Obama for sticking with the plan his predecessor signed for him.

*eyeroll*

Date: 2011-11-04 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
All hagiog(r)aphy and (r)evisionism aside, I'm going to need a citiation on the Bush administration saying this was anything but an epochal war. For every minor administrative quote about a 10 year time line, there are dozens tlaking about the danger of setting timelines for success.

Rumsfeld's unfounded confidence doesn't count, as he was an idiot.

Date: 2011-11-04 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
All hagiog(r)aphy and (r)evisionism aside,

Please point out where that occurred. Thanks.

I'm going to need a citiation on the Bush administration saying this was anything but an epochal war. For every minor administrative quote about a 10 year time line, there are dozens tlaking about the danger of setting timelines for success.

Announced in August 2008 (http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=36d07f1a-ecfc-480f-b10f-9688971b93be), approved by the Iraqis later that year (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/27/world/africa/27iht-27iraq-sofa.18201593.html).

Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-04 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
we should applaud Obama for sticking with the plan his predecessor signed for him.

August 2008? Good jorb. That was about when Bush was signing 16 trillion dollars to the banks, right?

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-04 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
You're a few dollars and a few months off.

Backing off the revisionism/hagiography charge, are we?

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-04 11:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
Nope. I'm not backing off anything. The Cheney admin had no commitment to a closing date nor proposed any specific strategic exit strategy during the vast majority of its time in the White House.

Obama needs to do a better job dismantling the Cheney executive power grab and its crazy reign of fear. That is the worst thing about the Obama administration thus far. I see no evidence that Romney would do any better.

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-05 04:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Nope. I'm not backing off anything. The Cheney admin had no commitment to a closing date nor proposed any specific strategic exit strategy during the vast majority of its time in the White House.

Putting aside your historical revisionism irt the "Cheney admin," that 2008 drawdown agreement proves you wrong.

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-05 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
Nah, the figure is 16 trillion.

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-05 08:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
http://socialsecurityinstitute.com/news/recent-news/staggering-16-trillion-fed-bank-bailout

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-05 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
I wasn't aware Bush ran the Fed from 2007-2010.

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-05 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
Who appointed Bernanke and took Greenspan's advice on deficits?

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-05 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Absolutely, but Bernanke is not the Hand of Bush.

Re: Right about here...

Date: 2011-11-06 05:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacotelic.livejournal.com
Was Bush the hand of Greenspan?

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 06:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios