Good enough. Sometimes the humor can be more important than the message, and there's nothing wrong with that.
In fact, Steve Kelley of the New Orleans Times-Picayune and Vic Harville of Little Rock, Arkansas (I forget the newspaper) seem to be the best at keeping topical cartoons humorous without editorializing too much. They've become two of my favorites for that reason.
I can't friggin' believe you guys. That is the right spelling. It's Conscience, NOT Conscious. Yuh know, that little voice that tells you right from wrong.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 10:41 pm (UTC)In fact, Steve Kelley of the New Orleans Times-Picayune and Vic Harville of Little Rock, Arkansas (I forget the newspaper) seem to be the best at keeping topical cartoons humorous without editorializing too much. They've become two of my favorites for that reason.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 10:54 pm (UTC)... and your icon is amazing... i love the Eagles
no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 11:36 pm (UTC)===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 11:56 pm (UTC)Ya
Date: 2005-01-28 05:08 am (UTC)More so Dr. Rice.
She's about a qualified...
Date: 2005-01-27 11:45 pm (UTC)Lying bitch is more like it....she should be put up on war crimes as well as the rest of her "party".
Re: She's about a qualified...
Date: 2005-01-28 12:13 am (UTC)Then we get to put your entire party up on charges of treason.
Re: She's about a qualified...
Date: 2005-01-28 01:40 am (UTC)Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
Date: 2005-01-28 04:55 am (UTC)Funny....i didn't see any Libertarians win anything?!
....and yes, the Dems should be put up for treason...for not standing up more against her in congress....and more for that Gonzalass too!
Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Um...shit for brains....
From:Re: Um...shit for brains....
From:Re: Um...shit for brains....
From:Re: Um...shit for brains....
From:Re: Um...shit for brains....
From:Re: Um...shit for brains....
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: Hero's??????
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
Date: 2005-01-28 05:20 am (UTC)Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:Re: She's about a qualified...
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 05:25 am (UTC)our standards are excellent.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 08:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 12:25 pm (UTC)I love you, Condie!!!
no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 07:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:too bad this is late but....
Date: 2005-02-01 02:13 am (UTC)Re: too bad this is late but....
From:no subject
Date: 2005-02-03 12:24 pm (UTC)The spelling complaints are amusing, too.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-28 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-29 09:52 pm (UTC)