Date: 2011-06-21 01:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] udoswald.livejournal.com
The liberals sided with the ability of government to seize properties and turn them over to businesses. As I said, I disagree with the eminent domain decision as much as I disagree with this WalMart decision, but saying that there's any connection between the two cases proves you don't know what you're talking about.

Date: 2011-06-21 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kharmii.livejournal.com
I never said there was a connection.

I'm just showing how you are being ridiculous by saying that conservatives hate people and love corporations, while liberals always vote for the people (unless it's about raising tax revenue by taking peoples' homes away so fancy hotels can get built. LOL!)

Date: 2011-06-21 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] udoswald.livejournal.com
I never said the libs on the court are perfect. They seem to be a bit enamored of certain types of government power (eminent domain being one of them). That being said, just because they sided with the use of eminent domain (because they hew to a philosophy of greater government power) doesn't mean that they "love corporations" or are against "the people". They would have supported government use of eminent domain no matter what the government ultimately decided to do with the land (make it into a park, build a government building on it, erect a monument to Mao...)

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 06:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios