[identity profile] camac.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] politicartoons
Ok I was driving back from the animal shelter today when I heard something incredible on NPR. I haven't seen any cartoons about it but this shit is important so I'll just post a video with the wonderfully animated and sometimes funny Rachel Maddow talking about it:



This is kind of amazing. I hope other New England states pick up on this idea and find the courage to come up with similar plans. I'm looking at you RI.

Date: 2011-05-26 07:44 pm (UTC)

Date: 2011-05-26 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jlc20thmaine.livejournal.com
So despite that fact single payer is not successful in any country, you still think it's a good idea.

Date: 2011-05-26 07:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Such as which countries?

Date: 2011-05-26 07:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
What's wrong in Canada? And if you mean GB as in Great Britain, they don't have single payer, they have nationalized healthcare.

Date: 2011-05-26 07:58 pm (UTC)

Date: 2011-05-26 07:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taiki.livejournal.com
What's wrong with the Canadian system?

Date: 2011-05-26 08:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] new-wave-witch.livejournal.com
It's not FREEDOM enough!

Date: 2011-05-26 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
Freedom, freedom, freedom, OI!

Date: 2011-05-26 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kip-w.livejournal.com
Well, this one Canadian guy said he knew somebody whose relative came over here for an expensive operation.

Date: 2011-05-26 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wight1984.livejournal.com
Did you really think that people were going to just take it as obviously true that Canadian and British healthcare is 'not successful'?

Personally, one of the things that thrills me about being British is having an NHS and not having to deal with the way places like the US do healthcare.

Date: 2011-05-26 11:09 pm (UTC)
ext_46651: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mikepictor.livejournal.com
You're so cute. Don't ever change.

Someone needs to cling to those delusions.

Date: 2011-05-27 01:24 am (UTC)

Date: 2011-06-03 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com
The only way I can see you making any sort of sense here is if you're defining "successful" as "insanely lucrative".

Date: 2011-05-26 08:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
So despite that fact single payer is not successful in any country

Show me those facts, pl0x.

(edited for typo)

Date: 2011-05-26 11:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
Works here, but we have combined UHC, Single Payer and Private Insurance. We get the best of all worlds.

Date: 2011-05-26 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Single-payer always seemed like the best solution for businesses to me. No wrangling with multiple insurance companies, and just let the doctors do the doctoring.

Date: 2011-05-26 08:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
The US has lost business to Canada over it (e.g. several automotive plants that originally were going to be built here in the states went to Canada due to high health care costs in the U.S.)

Date: 2011-05-26 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
Health care attached to employment is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Talk about the road to serfdom.

Date: 2011-05-26 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
I think this is an older clip? Didn't it pass the Vermont Senate and the governor signed it into law. I think the next step is for Vermont to get Congress to approve its exemption.

Date: 2011-05-26 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
This won't end well for Vermont.

Date: 2011-05-26 08:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
If it does end well, will you change your tune? :P

Date: 2011-05-26 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Absolutely, but I'm not too worried.

Date: 2011-05-26 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blueduck37.livejournal.com
And if it ends up saving Vermont (the state itself, local businesses, etc etc) money, and becomes very popular, will you agree that other states nationwide should implement it?

Date: 2011-05-26 11:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
You need to set some rules on what "success" is now, otherwise those goalposts will shift faster that a politician looking at an opinion poll.

Date: 2011-05-28 03:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
How have I moved the goalposts? "It saves money and is popular" is not in and of itself a reason to favor a policy. There are still many, many different reasons to oppose UHC of any sort.

Date: 2011-05-26 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
Jeff will whistle another tune, we can be sure.

Date: 2011-05-26 11:14 pm (UTC)
ext_46651: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mikepictor.livejournal.com
You've got no reasonable basis to say so until people can see more about how it's implemented.

Date: 2011-05-27 01:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Let's put it this way - the problem with the Massachusetts system definitely isn't that it doesn't go far enough.

Date: 2011-06-03 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com
You're right for once. The problem with the Massachusetts system is that it's the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of Vermont's. Vermont's plan is socialist. The Romney/Obama plan is corporatist/fascist.

Date: 2011-06-03 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Those two words are interchangeable.

Date: 2011-06-03 07:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com
And that's one of the biggest lies ever told.

Date: 2011-06-03 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com
The notion that the word "socialism" is interchangeable with the words "fascism" and "corporatism". Or even "communism", for that matter. It's Cold War linguistic propaganda.

Or were you saying that "fascism" and "corporatism" are interchangeable? Because history and I would agree with that.

Date: 2011-06-03 08:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Well, yes, I am, but there's no fundamental difference between socialism and fascism. They go hand in hand. To say that the Massachusetts plan, which offers more choice, is more fascist simply doesn't add up.

Date: 2011-06-03 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com
"there's no fundamental difference between socialism and fascism"

You didn't just drink the kool-aid; you drowned in it.

Date: 2011-05-26 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Congrats to Vermont, I wait to see how it goes in the future, and see if their model can be extrapolated out to the whole country, or if it is a hot mess. We shall see.

Date: 2011-05-26 11:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farchivist.livejournal.com
You're not suppose to be congratulating them. That's not conservative doctrine. You need to rage about how Vermont is going to become a pit of despair.

Date: 2011-05-27 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Guess I am just a maverick.

Image

Date: 2011-05-26 10:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamie-miller.livejournal.com
Animal shelter? NPR? What are you, some kind of hippie?

:)

Date: 2011-06-03 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com
Yeah! I wish Obama had copied Peter Shumlin's plan instead of Mitt fucking Romney's.

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 01:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios