Profile
Political Cartoons
Page Summary
soliloquy76.livejournal.com - (no subject)
telemann.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jessica-leah.livejournal.com - (no subject)
phillipalden.livejournal.com - (no subject)
spencer-mato.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lafinjack.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lafinjack.livejournal.com - (no subject)
spencer-mato.livejournal.com - (no subject)
phillipalden.livejournal.com - (no subject)
xxrancid-punkxx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
http://users.livejournal.com/gaburieru_/ - (no subject)
jamie-miller.livejournal.com - (no subject)
johnny9fingers.livejournal.com - (no subject)
yes-justice.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 03:19 am (UTC)The thing that pisses me off is the PACT act which is attempting to make tobacco an un-mailable product(which they say UPS is already doing, which is bullshit because I still get the UPS shipping option when I order snus) because unpaid tobacco taxes SUPPOSEDLY fund terrorism. The Comstock law comes to mind. Dammit, the post office is suffering enough as it is, this is one thing they can still make some cash off of(because UPS is godawful expensive) and you're trying to take it away. Not to mention all of the Indian reservations that make a living off of growing and selling tobacco products. That is the bill that pisses me off. I can't believe that these aren't getting any press beyond snus communities.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:22 am (UTC)This law is especially stupid because it allows for the sale of menthols, which, oddly enough, all the underage smokers I knew smoked. Newports and Salems are cheap, and very easy to obtain. In fact, there were often excursions to a local Getty to get cartons because they were especially cheap there. When I heard about the law, only after it was signed into law, I was extremely angry. I can understand banning the "low tar" labels, but not flavors. I only hope this will be overturned eventually. A lot of the things we consume are hazardous to our health, but there is no movement to ban McDonald's or Burger King from marketing to kids. Or to make high sugar cereals have to print huge "This Cereal can rot your teeth, and make you fat" labels. Or on colas such as Mountain Dew, Surge, or Jolt "Caffeine may stunt your child's growth". It's extremely hypocritical.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 05:17 am (UTC)And when that baby grows up he will be President.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 06:38 am (UTC)Just imagine that baby...
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 10:07 am (UTC)Does figure this mean that (in this post racial society) Obama is only 25% black?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 06:32 am (UTC)