![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Ladies and and Gentlemen,
I need some help. From discussions here I have got an impression that reference to a monkey is racistic. Various posters and signs featuring monkeys were more than once presented here in order to prove the racist nature of anti-Obama movement.
Being born far from here, I'm not sure I fully understand this cultural reference.
Here are two pictures:

First one is from Liberal Street Fighter, 2006, second one is from here, found via Google.
I will highly appreciate the comprehensive explanation: are both pictures racist? If only one, which one and why?
UPD: Thanks everybody, I got it. Could have guessed actually.
I need some help. From discussions here I have got an impression that reference to a monkey is racistic. Various posters and signs featuring monkeys were more than once presented here in order to prove the racist nature of anti-Obama movement.
Being born far from here, I'm not sure I fully understand this cultural reference.
Here are two pictures:

First one is from Liberal Street Fighter, 2006, second one is from here, found via Google.
I will highly appreciate the comprehensive explanation: are both pictures racist? If only one, which one and why?
UPD: Thanks everybody, I got it. Could have guessed actually.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:09 pm (UTC)Racist portrayals and language are nothing but tradition and convention. There's no reason why certain words or images should be inherently racist; they become racist due to the tradition and history of use.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 07:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:11 pm (UTC)Historically black people have been compared to monkeys. There are still racial slurs against black people that use that comparison. This is not the case for white people.
The former does not evoke any racial slur because there is none to be evoked.
The latter does evoke those racial slurs and does reinforce that negative image of black people.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 04:14 am (UTC)doot dooooo, do do do
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:16 pm (UTC)I'll give you the benefit of the doubt since you were not born in America, but trust me when I tell you that in America there is a very serious, deep context of racism behind the monkey comparison for blacks.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:51 pm (UTC)But the slur references apes as often as monkeys, so far as your question goes it's all one.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 08:23 pm (UTC)I spent about ten minutes in my Arabic class the other day trying to figure out what the word قرد meant. The video we watched in class claimed at one point that it meant "gorilla" but later it said "monkey." And my professor connected it a picture of a chimp on the flash cards he made us. Biology isn't his thing, so it was really hard to frame the question in a way that made sense to him.
Anyway, I was finally able to conclude that it means "monkey or ape" and not any specific species of primate.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 07:42 pm (UTC)*faceplam*
I wanna go "no, you didn't...none of us did. We evolved from an ape ancestor, you twit."
no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 07:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 07:38 pm (UTC)19th century medical journal illustration trying to show through phrenology (study of the skull) that blacks were scientifically inferior to humans, more in common with apes.
And this is a clip from Spike Lee's "Bamboozled," it's a montage of stereotypical representations of blacks in film and cartoons. Especially pay attention to the cartoons: there was a preoccupation with representing blcaks as the "other", as African tribespeople who live the jungle and act, behave and live with...yes, the monkeys.
Hope this helps give clarification!
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 07:59 pm (UTC)It does appear that some folk would prefer that we returned to those days. Oh well.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 08:43 pm (UTC)http://www.4music.com/artist/tinchy-stryder/tinchy-stryder-profile.html
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-20 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 07:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 12:38 am (UTC)Yeah, that'd be AWESOME!
no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 05:54 am (UTC)My favorite counter to this specific question is "and where exactly were you planning to use ni**er in polite conversation, mr. white man?"
no subject
Date: 2009-09-20 12:07 am (UTC)2) Context (!). A lot of white people use redneck or white trash in-group all the time and proudly so. If someone out-group used it in a derogatory manner they'd probably get pissed off, and rightfully so.
Bingo. I never understand, for the life of me, why people pretend to not be aware that the in-group vs. out-group factor cuts across every culture and runs generations.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 07:52 am (UTC)