(no subject)
Jul. 17th, 2009 12:25 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
jlc20thmaine.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
politicartoons
jlc20thmaine.livejournal.com posting in politicartoonsjlc20thmaine.livejournal.com posting in politicartoons
Profile
Political Cartoons
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 04:46 pm (UTC)Sessions on the other hand spoke to Sotomayor like she was his fucking MAID and he was trying to make it clear he wanted the bathroom floor scrubbed every Tuesday before poker night. I have never in my life heard a guy say in so many different ways that he wanted it to be perfectly clear that the judge understood that people have the right to own guns. Dude, say it again, she didn't understand you the first 150 times you said it. Jesus CHRIST!!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 04:51 pm (UTC)However the wise latina is anti-gun ownership and has ignored the Heller decision. So Sessions had every right to say what he did.
By the way, care to provide the 150 times Sessions talked about gun rights? or is this just another lie, like the millions of scientists or the 5 million of people that were in the National Mall?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 05:11 pm (UTC)You're that fucking stupid. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Sotomayor is no more anti-gun than any other jurist. It's a fucking amdendment to the Constitution, it's pretty fucking black and white what the intent was. Sessions and his puppetmasters are just paranoid and listen to Limbaugh too much, who tells them to believe that any liberal and anyone Obama would choose is anti-gun. Which is y'know, stupid and insane, which is what we've come to expect from the nutball right, so it's par for the course, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:57 pm (UTC)You're really, really doing that?
You... are a very. VERY special person. Yes indeed.
special
Date: 2009-07-17 09:00 pm (UTC)Dumb bastard kept trying to gnaw on the hurdles.
Date: 2009-07-18 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:59 pm (UTC)Of COURSE it's insincere, you fucking retard; it's insincere because (a) I don't take anything you say seriously and (b) it's all bullshit anyway!! Don't you GET IT YET??
no subject
Date: 2009-07-19 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 07:32 pm (UTC)*snort*
Yeah, you do that, sport. And all the while, Franken will be busy in the United States Senate, stifling your side's votes.
He who laughs last, laughs best. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-18 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-19 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-18 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-18 02:31 pm (UTC)When I'm not lazy I'll link to the SomethingPositive reference comic.
via S*P (http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp12102002.shtml)
You obviously don't understand anarchy
Date: 2009-07-19 04:43 am (UTC)Preperation H comes in a two pack, and there's a sale.
Date: 2009-07-17 09:21 pm (UTC)Re: Preperation H comes in a two pack, and there's a sale.
Date: 2009-07-17 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-19 09:14 pm (UTC)Why?
And by this logic, I'm surprised the entire state of Texas hasn't keeled over with the number of winnars they've produced.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 05:05 pm (UTC)I, however, have (sadly) been watching/listening to the hearings in full all week, and found Sen. Franken's questioning to be among the more intelligent... an initial attempt at humor (evil!) aside. In particular, I liked his lengthy debate with Sotomayor on the important issue of net neutrality, an issue that often doesn't get much press.
It certainly was an improvement over the openly condescending (and quietly racist) berating that she was getting from the right side of the panel who acknowledged that she'll be confirmed but berated her anyway (focusing instead on one comment she made, and one ruling she made in her lengthy career) all while lamenting how white Christian males just can't catch a break in America anymore.
Go do a survey on the streets of what people took away from these hearings and what Senators left impressions on them (and what kind) and I assure that no one will be thinking of (or remember) the newbie's Perry Mason joke.
But you go ahead and enjoy it.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 05:14 pm (UTC)No kidding, man; when she took the bench she's on now my hair was still dark. Thassa long time.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-17 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-18 02:35 pm (UTC)