[identity profile] reality-hammer.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] politicartoons
Because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that Obama is trying to mislead the easily misled with this one.



Seriously, who (outside of an Obamaniac) thinks cutting $100 million is a significant achievement?

Date: 2009-04-21 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thies.livejournal.com
Guess we should just cut the military, infrastructure and educational spendings by 90% to get back on track to small government.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thies.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 02:22 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thies.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:16 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 01:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 04:43 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dr-pepper-spray.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 05:17 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rumorsofwar.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 06:45 am (UTC) - Expand

Oh, FFS.

From: [identity profile] ubiquitous-a.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 02:41 am (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Oh, FFS.

From: [identity profile] rawbery79.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 04:36 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: Oh, FFS.

From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 01:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-04-21 02:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] epikaste.livejournal.com
facepalm.jpg
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] epikaste.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:23 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] drivebyluna.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:29 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-04-21 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ygrii-blop.livejournal.com
Really, if they'd cut the defense budget by half, that would be a tremendous savings right there and we'd still have the largest, most bloated military in the world.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:01 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] texas-reddmann.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:21 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 01:42 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-04-21 03:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thies.livejournal.com
my money is on the repudrones then foaming at the mouth about the potential uprise of out of work soldiers and it's again... time for a revolutioooon! *runs around screaming with excitement*
Edited Date: 2009-04-21 03:02 am (UTC)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thies.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:21 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] capthek.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:28 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rumorsofwar.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 06:47 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 01:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thomasblair.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 06:07 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thies.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 11:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thomasblair.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-22 03:41 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theomni.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:49 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-22 04:09 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 01:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-04-21 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greystroke.livejournal.com
I think China has about 6,000,000 in uniform at all times ... full employment you know ...

Date: 2009-04-21 02:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadaria.livejournal.com
Wow, we are "not fooled" but using findings from the Heritage Foundation...
I lol'ed.

Date: 2009-04-21 02:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
Back up your numbers using real sources or fail yet again.



(no subject)

From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:06 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] capthek.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:28 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:34 am (UTC) - Expand

Answer, coward.

From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:06 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: Answer, coward.

From: [identity profile] jlc20thmaine.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 12:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: Answer, coward.

From: [identity profile] epikaste.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 03:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 01:44 pm (UTC) - Expand
From: [identity profile] texas-reddmann.livejournal.com
Okay spunk for brains. Let's cover this.

Source. (http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy10/index.html) Factual even, with those little details you and your sites like to leave out....again and again and again.

Note: The federal fiscal year starts from Oct. 1 to Sept. 31, so we're currently running off a budget (FY2009) enacted before Obama even got elected.

FY2008: 2.524 Trillion dollars brought in, 2.983 Trillion dollars paid out, 459 million added to the deficit.

FY2009: 2.186 Trillion brought in, 3.938 Trillion paid out, 1.752 Trillion added to the deficit.

Now, when you remove the parts added by Congress re: bailing out the banks, wall street, and insurance agencies operating under Bushie's rules for 8 years, I bet this would be less.

On to the deficit: First, Source, (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2009/pdf/hist.pdf) via here. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt#cite_note-autogenerated1-19)

We crossed the first Trillion mark right around 1990, post-Reagan/mid-Bush Sr., when we were at 3.233 Trillion dollars. In 2000, we were at 5.674 Trillion. In '05, it was 7.933, in '07 it was 9.008, in '08 it was 10.699 Trillion.

We're in this because of "conservative" ideas and spending. Now do the world, or at least us, a favor and shut the hell up. He's been in office for three months, and has done a pretty damn good job, considering what he was given to start with.
From: [identity profile] texas-reddmann.livejournal.com
Oh, yeah, just to add: The last time we had a Democrat as President, he took us from a yearly deficit to a yearly surplus. Long term, it looks as if this one can do the same. The key is long term, and according to your "conservative" sources, 3 months should be long enough. What will your sneering arguments be in a few years, when the numbers start going down again?
From: [identity profile] rawbery79.livejournal.com
Eh, he won't respond. He's nothing but a big fat pussy chickenshit.
From: [identity profile] thomasblair.livejournal.com
Bush was a ridiculous fiscal manager. That said, you can't pin Obama's stimulus affecting FY2009 on Bush. Nor can you pin the appropriations bill on Bush.

Date: 2009-04-21 04:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blueduck37.livejournal.com
Can you take the Matt Taibbi challenge (http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/04/19/questions-for-teabaggers/)?

Date: 2009-04-21 12:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jlc20thmaine.livejournal.com
Using the "teabagging" comment gives this an enormous fail.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] i.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 01:46 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-04-21 04:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rawbery79.livejournal.com
You really bring down the collective IQ of this community, dontcha?

Date: 2009-04-21 05:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atreides74.livejournal.com
You're truly retarded.

Date: 2009-04-21 06:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fayanora.livejournal.com
The budget is the way it is because it's the best option to get us free from this economic sinkhole that Bush & co tossed the country into. You want someone to blame for this shit, blame Bush & co for getting us into this economic mess in the first place.

Date: 2009-04-21 12:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jlc20thmaine.livejournal.com
So the Nobama plan of putting money into the economy by taking money out of the economy then putting it back into the economy and taxing it as it passes through has been nothing but a huge failure.

While it's easy to blame Bush, just what were the dems doing during those 8 years? Besides obstructing choice of schools, back-stabbing the military, and keeping us dependent on foreign oil?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fayanora.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 12:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] jlc20thmaine.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-21 06:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fayanora.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-22 01:11 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-23 10:29 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-04-23 10:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-04-21 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
Image

Every news item I've heard states that everyone knows that this $100mill is a drop in the bucket; it remains to be seen if there will be more cuts or not.

You guys really don't know how to do populism, do you...

And boy, have you gotten PWNED in this post.

Date: 2009-04-21 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ice-hesitant.livejournal.com
Look, it's PR. It's the same reason why right-wing politicians and newspapers complain endlessly when city councillors or members of parliament get a pay increase, even though their pay is a drop in the bucket compared to the city budget, or the provincial budget. Blah blah blah, cut the fat, blah blah blah, outsource the watering of the plants maybe save a couple thousand, thus drastically reducing the seven billion dollar budget, blah blah blah.

Apparently, it works on some people. There've been lot of symbolic pay freezes this year, even though elected representative pay is spare change compared to the overall budgets. There's been a lot of senseless complaining about pay that wasn't being frozen.

Bah, humbug. Yay, symbolism.

Profile

Political Cartoons

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 1st, 2026 02:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios