2. 1 Should read "look at those poor dupes taken in by obvious astroturf"
2.2 Show me proof anyone involved was put under surveilance for their participation. Yeah, didn't think so. Borderline Godwin.
2.3 Any illegal domestic surveillance program would have been initiated under Bush's administration. Irony overload.
3.1 Show me the soldiers put under surveilance for their willingness to serve. Yeah, didn't think so. Borderline Godwin.
3.2 Show me ANY soldiers put under surveillance for ANYTHING but actual criminal activity. Yeah, didn't think so. Borderline Godwin.
3.3 Rightards do not have a monopoly on military service. Fuck you for trying to diminish any soldiers service by claiming otherwise.
3.4 The only way this cartoon would have held ANY semblance of truth would be if he was captioned something like 'secessionist' or 'stormfront', 'armed cultist' or 'wingnut militia'. But that's clearly meant to be a US soldier. Low low low. More borderline Godwin. Have you people no shame?
Of course. Because Rush says so. See, anything someone says that doesn't agree with Blobbo the Conservative Mesiah is a facist socialist nut, ergo anything they don't agree with must be right.
"The medium of the political cartoon, which combines the political and the artistic with journalism, provides interested persons the chance to express their social concerns or political views creatively. It allows them to make social commentary beyond the boundaries of the written word. Most political cartoons are "designed to influence viewers with regard to specific political events of the day"
The government monitors potential extremism on both the left and right. But only the right (which has gone back to their 1990s unmarked black helicopters paranoia) think it's a sign of political repression.
Don't want the government to think you're an extremist? Don't act like one. (note: I'm not talking about conservatives who wanna teabag each other in front of the White House-- and neither was DHS-- but rather crazy people who think they need to stock up on arms and formed an armed resistance to Obama's private army and FEMA concentration camps)
PS- Kudos, though, to conservatives for deciding they care about civil liberties again. I remembering during the Bush years (remember him?! (http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/04/19/questions-for-teabaggers/)) that we were told 'if you don't have anything to hide, why are you worried?'. Your ACLU card is in the mail.
PPS-- Unabomber. Oklahoma City. This is the type of thing DHS is worried about. Again... not some morons throwing boxes of tea over the White House fence (yes, that happened).
...has Napolitano expressed any desire to do any of these things? Beyond the obvious cautiousness about the number of reality-challenged people out there "protesting" getting taxed LESS, talking about secession, and buying guns at a rate previously unheard of in world history?
Have the artists behind these drawings sat and listened to Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh lately? I'm guessing not.
Once again the Right wing is doing more to damage its own credibility than the Left could ever hope to do. Napolitano puts out a memo about white supremacists and domestic terrorist groups recruiting returning veterans and the Right gets defensive. Methinks they protest too much.
The memo did not say we needed to watch vets. It said we needed to watch extremists trying to recruit veterans, who are upset at one thing or another, and that the extremists can try to twist around. Personally, I like that idea. It's not the vets they're blaming, but the nuts. Get rid of the nuts, and this won't be an issue.
But then the original poster and his buddies would lose their source of news and information to parrot back, so we now why they're upset and trying to twist the meaning of other people's words around.
Grade: Fail. Surprise: None.
P.S. Layoff us vets. Most of us aren't idiots, and are getting tired of people like you twisting words to find reasons to use us to justify your load of bogus crap.
I love how the Right has actually embraced the white supremacy groups specified by Napolitano's memo as if they're one of their own.
Also: see last eight years if you want to know what it looks like when the government really starts targeting political opponents.
Okay, onto the cartoons:
1.) the American revolutionaries were liberals. Also: ..YOU WISH!
2.) Napolitano looks like Kuato from Total Recall.
3.) Is that supposed to be a soldier or a survivalist with a friggin' machine gun? In which case "fighting for your country" takes on a very dark connotation.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 04:48 pm (UTC)How quickly they forget that reports were request by Bush on BOTH sides of the aisle.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:01 pm (UTC)Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 05:05 pm (UTC)2. 1 Should read "look at those poor dupes taken in by obvious astroturf"
2.2 Show me proof anyone involved was put under surveilance for their participation.
Yeah, didn't think so. Borderline Godwin.
2.3 Any illegal domestic surveillance program would have been initiated under Bush's administration. Irony overload.
3.1 Show me the soldiers put under surveilance for their willingness to serve.
Yeah, didn't think so. Borderline Godwin.
3.2 Show me ANY soldiers put under surveillance for ANYTHING but actual criminal activity.
Yeah, didn't think so. Borderline Godwin.
3.3 Rightards do not have a monopoly on military service. Fuck you for trying to diminish any soldiers service by claiming otherwise.
3.4 The only way this cartoon would have held ANY semblance of truth would be if he was captioned something like 'secessionist' or 'stormfront', 'armed cultist' or 'wingnut militia'. But that's clearly meant to be a US soldier. Low low low. More borderline Godwin.
Have you people no shame?
Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 05:35 pm (UTC)Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 05:39 pm (UTC)Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 05:46 pm (UTC)Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 07:00 pm (UTC)Re: Anti-Clowns
Date: 2009-04-20 08:33 pm (UTC)Transmetropolitan is brilliant. (seeming oddly relevant these days.)
Re: Anti-Clowns
Date: 2009-04-20 08:47 pm (UTC)Re: Anti-Clowns
Date: 2009-04-20 09:13 pm (UTC)Though now that you mention it Obama does kind of remind me of "the smiler"
/tongue-in-cheek
Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:59 pm (UTC)Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 06:43 pm (UTC)They "must be," huh.
You got any cites whatsoever to back up any of this bizarre reality-challenged crap?
Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 06:46 pm (UTC)Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-20 07:10 pm (UTC)Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-21 08:24 am (UTC)Yes, because that is the criteria for truth; opposition. Not.
Date: 2009-04-20 07:42 pm (UTC)I love how you have NO answers for any of my points.
Re: Yes, because that is the criteria for truth; opposition. Not.
Date: 2009-04-21 12:19 pm (UTC)You never disappoint.
Date: 2009-04-22 04:00 am (UTC)Predictably, all you can do in response is name-call.
Re: Ultimate fail.
Date: 2009-04-21 01:41 am (UTC)No, cupcake, it is you that do not understand the concept of a cartoon.
Date: 2009-04-21 01:56 am (UTC)"The medium of the political cartoon, which combines the political and the artistic with journalism, provides interested persons the chance to express their social concerns or political views creatively. It allows them to make social commentary beyond the boundaries of the written word. Most political cartoons are "designed to influence viewers with regard to specific political events of the day"
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA96/PUCK/part1.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editorial_cartoon
http://www2.truman.edu/parker/research/cartoons.html
Critiquing that social commentary is perfectly valid, as with any other form of speech.
You. Fail. Again.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:33 pm (UTC)Long live the Patriot Act!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:33 pm (UTC)Don't want the government to think you're an extremist? Don't act like one. (note: I'm not talking about conservatives who wanna teabag each other in front of the White House-- and neither was DHS-- but rather crazy people who think they need to stock up on arms and formed an armed resistance to Obama's private army and FEMA concentration camps)
PS- Kudos, though, to conservatives for deciding they care about civil liberties again. I remembering during the Bush years (remember him?! (http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/04/19/questions-for-teabaggers/)) that we were told 'if you don't have anything to hide, why are you worried?'. Your ACLU card is in the mail.
PPS-- Unabomber. Oklahoma City. This is the type of thing DHS is worried about. Again... not some morons throwing boxes of tea over the White House fence (yes, that happened).
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:30 pm (UTC)Oh, wait...
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:41 pm (UTC)...
...has Napolitano expressed any desire to do any of these things? Beyond the obvious cautiousness about the number of reality-challenged people out there "protesting" getting taxed LESS, talking about secession, and buying guns at a rate previously unheard of in world history?
Have the artists behind these drawings sat and listened to Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh lately? I'm guessing not.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:56 pm (UTC)But then the original poster and his buddies would lose their source of news and information to parrot back, so we now why they're upset and trying to twist the meaning of other people's words around.
Grade: Fail. Surprise: None.
P.S. Layoff us vets. Most of us aren't idiots, and are getting tired of people like you twisting words to find reasons to use us to justify your load of bogus crap.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 08:25 am (UTC)Protest too much, much?
Date: 2009-04-20 10:57 pm (UTC)Also: see last eight years if you want to know what it looks like when the government really starts targeting political opponents.
Okay, onto the cartoons:
1.) the American revolutionaries were liberals. Also: ..YOU WISH!
2.) Napolitano looks like Kuato from Total Recall.
3.) Is that supposed to be a soldier or a survivalist with a friggin' machine gun? In which case "fighting for your country" takes on a very dark connotation.
Re: Protest too much, much?
Date: 2009-04-21 02:43 am (UTC)And one that NO Republican politician that I'm aware of has had the balls to address and condemn.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 08:26 am (UTC)