"It's unclear whether the claims of Horton's source are true. It sounds more like a responsibility-shifting excuse than anything else -- a way of blaming Republicans rather than Obama officials for the failure to disclose these memos -- but it doesn't matter in the slightest if the claims are true. There is absolutely no justification whatsoever to continue to conceal these memos, and the fact that the GOP will stomp its feet and obstruct nominees doesn't come close to constituting an excuse for ongoing concealment." http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/06/memos/
Yeah but this is counter to the Obama administration "pulling a Bush" (heh) by arguing that all your (terrorist) base are ours and you can't sue us because of our wiretapping (state secrets and all).
Releasing the memos would lend weight to the accusation that the government is "self publishing" its anti-terrorism policies and thus welcoming inquiries and possible lawsuits based on those policies.
So the people who did the torture are using torture as a threat to prevent the release of the torture memos.
The Obama Administration is continued delay of release of the torture memos, so how exactly they're pinning a big GOP elephant on all of this now, I don't really understand. http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/06/memos/
"Today, in The Daily Beast, Horton -- citing an anonymous Obama DOJ source and an anonymous Senate GOP source -- claims that Senate Republicans are now "blackmailing" Obama by threatening to filibuster the confirmation of two Obama legal appointees (Dawn Johnsen as head of the OLC and Harold Koh as State Department legal counsel) unless Obama agrees not to release these OLC memos."
Well, I don't know about the other guy but Republicans are dicussing the filibuster against Dawn Johnsen because she is not just pro-choice but pro-abortion. She has claimed that not being allowed to have an abortion is the same as slavery and should be covered under the 13th amendment.
But you can believe what people have been saying about her for the last couple weeks or some anonymous source in a left-wing blog.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 11:05 pm (UTC)http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/06/memos/
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 05:47 am (UTC)Releasing the memos would lend weight to the accusation that the government is "self publishing" its anti-terrorism policies and thus welcoming inquiries and possible lawsuits based on those policies.
Thus my "wut?" response to the cartoon.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 11:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 11:02 pm (UTC)So the people who did the torture are using torture as a threat to prevent the release of the torture memos.
The Obama Administration is continued delay of release of the torture memos, so how exactly they're pinning a big GOP elephant on all of this now, I don't really understand.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/06/memos/
Are the two unmasked people specific people?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 11:51 pm (UTC)"Today, in The Daily Beast, Horton -- citing an anonymous Obama DOJ source and an anonymous Senate GOP source -- claims that Senate Republicans are now "blackmailing" Obama by threatening to filibuster the confirmation of two Obama legal appointees (Dawn Johnsen as head of the OLC and Harold Koh as State Department legal counsel) unless Obama agrees not to release these OLC memos."
I think the point is "who're the terrorists now?"
no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 01:04 am (UTC): /
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-07 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 12:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:obama drug addled? yeah, like bush was an english major.
From:Re: obama drug addled? yeah, like bush was an english major.
From:Re: obama drug addled? yeah, like bush was an english major.
From:Re: obama drug addled? yeah, like bush was an english major.
From:Re: obama drug addled? yeah, like bush was an english major.
From:Re: obama drug addled? yeah, like bush was an english major.
From:Re: obama drug addled? yeah, like bush was an english major.
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 12:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 05:51 am (UTC)Yet Democrats seem determined to goad him into doing just that all over again when he was clearly happy enjoying his "multi-millions". :D
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 01:30 am (UTC)But you can believe what people have been saying about her for the last couple weeks or some anonymous source in a left-wing blog.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:That's mAnn, sweetie.
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 01:24 pm (UTC)YOU ARE WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 04:14 am (UTC)