Back that truck up. You can't claim "suppression" of science that doesn't exist. I just pointed out how the study referenced by the item does not actually make the claim the item does. There is nothing there to be "suppressed"!
We could go through all the rest on that list together if you like. (I'm assuming of course that you haven't.)
There are IQ differences among individual families that dwarf those between any races you could care to define. (And yes, the number and definition of races is very open to interpretation, because there are nearly infinite qualities to choose as grouping terms.)
Do you understand what that means, though? About differences within a group totally swamping the differences between groups, on the high and low ends? It means that you cannot use an average of the group to make a claim about the individuals within it, with any sort of confidence. That's important.
Let's take an example. Give me a link to your scientific paper(s) that claim there are "IQ differences among the races".
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2017-02-11 10:43 pm (UTC)We could go through all the rest on that list together if you like. (I'm assuming of course that you haven't.)
There are IQ differences among individual families that dwarf those between any races you could care to define. (And yes, the number and definition of races is very open to interpretation, because there are nearly infinite qualities to choose as grouping terms.)
Do you understand what that means, though? About differences within a group totally swamping the differences between groups, on the high and low ends? It means that you cannot use an average of the group to make a claim about the individuals within it, with any sort of confidence. That's important.
Let's take an example. Give me a link to your scientific paper(s) that claim there are "IQ differences among the races".