My response needs to be weighed in respect to the context I'm responding to. Someone presented their opinion as facts, and because it was declared as fact, it was deemed unquestionable. I called that liberal logic.
Don't seriously expect me to adhere to the rules of logic when the other party is playing identity politics. If you were being objective, I wouldn't have to point this all out to you. Instead, you would've realized I was being cheeky and playing tit for tat.
I suppose this means what I've been saying doesn't set well with you, and that's why you cherry picked me to correct. QED
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2017-02-10 05:32 am (UTC)Don't seriously expect me to adhere to the rules of logic when the other party is playing identity politics. If you were being objective, I wouldn't have to point this all out to you. Instead, you would've realized I was being cheeky and playing tit for tat.
I suppose this means what I've been saying doesn't set well with you, and that's why you cherry picked me to correct.
QED