Because the major players are the ones to whom most regulations and government interventions apply.
Actually, most regulations exist to try and keep competition out. That's why big business likes to pick and choose which ones to support. See: CISPA, net neutrality, etc.
No you haven't. The 77ยข on the dollar figure is a genuine statistic, as your so-called "proof" clearly states.
And one with no real basis for anything, as the statistics show.
Oh, so 39% is not a significant number of people to you, even though it's almost half?
I didn't say that, now did I?
Maybe it wasn't a majority, but being close to half is pretty significant
But we're looking at what you claimed, not what's "pretty significant." Especially for someone who was complaining about being misquoted after being so profoundly wrong about basically everything she's said, we should probably stick to what's being said, right?
As for your second statement, that figure is generally accepted as profoundly inaccurate.
I agree, but most on your side don't. But, then again, you probably think (erroneously) that the number is higher and not lower. It's actually much lower.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2014-07-16 11:46 am (UTC)Actually, most regulations exist to try and keep competition out. That's why big business likes to pick and choose which ones to support. See: CISPA, net neutrality, etc.
No you haven't. The 77ยข on the dollar figure is a genuine statistic, as your so-called "proof" clearly states.
And one with no real basis for anything, as the statistics show.
Oh, so 39% is not a significant number of people to you, even though it's almost half?
I didn't say that, now did I?
Maybe it wasn't a majority, but being close to half is pretty significant
But we're looking at what you claimed, not what's "pretty significant." Especially for someone who was complaining about being misquoted after being so profoundly wrong about basically everything she's said, we should probably stick to what's being said, right?
As for your second statement, that figure is generally accepted as profoundly inaccurate.
I agree, but most on your side don't. But, then again, you probably think (erroneously) that the number is higher and not lower. It's actually much lower.